Inspector of Police, PEW Steel Plant vs Santhoshkumar — 41/2026

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--Conviction on 05th March 2026.

Case disposed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNSA090011412024

e-Filing Number

29-07-2024

Filing Number

1140/2024

Filing Date

02-Aug-2024

Registration No

41/2026

Registration Date

07-Jan-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sankari

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

Decision Date

05-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Conviction

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, PEW Steel Plant

    Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE PEW STEELPLANT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Santhoshkumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court at Sankari, Salem found accused Santhoshkumar guilty of violating Section 4(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act after he pleaded guilty to the charges. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 1,000, with a default sentence of one week simple imprisonment; the fine was paid immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Admission

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  7. 07-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 02-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 41/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court at Sankari, Salem found accused Santhoshkumar guilty of violating Section 4(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act after he pleaded guilty to the charges. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 1,000, with a default sentence of one week simple imprisonment; the fine was paid immediately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case