Sub-Inspector of Police, Md.,Choutry P.S., vs Dhanapal — 101/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),506(ii),352. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th May 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNSA090004892023

Evidence

Next Hearing

15th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

488/2023

Filing Date

17-04-2023

Registration No

101/2023

Registration Date

17-04-2023

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sankari

Judge

4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Sankari

FIR Details

FIR Number

40

Police Station

Md.CHOULTRY P.S

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 294(b),506(ii),352
TN PROHIBITION OF HARASSMENT OF WOMAN ACT, 2002 Section 4,

Petitioner(s)

Sub-Inspector of Police, Md.,Choutry P.S.,

Adv. APP.

Respondent(s)

Dhanapal

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Sankari

15-04-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

09-01-2026

Evidence

17-12-2025

Evidence

12-11-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

13-05-2024
Copy of Deposition

Summary: This document records witness depositions in Criminal Case No. 101/2023 before the Judicial Magistrate Court II, Sankari, dated 13.05.2024. Three witnesses testified under Chapter XXIII of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding an alleged incident of assault and causing injury, with one witness (the mother) alleging that the accused assaulted her and her daughter resulted in fatal consequences. No cross-examination was conducted by the accused's defense counsel as opportunity was provided but not exercised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This document records witness depositions in Criminal Case No. 101/2023 before the Judicial Magistrate Court II, Sankari, dated 13.05.2024. Three witnesses testified under Chapter XXIII of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding an alleged incident of assault and causing injury, with one witness (the mother) alleging that the accused assaulted her and her daughter resulted in fatal consequences. No cross-examination was conducted by the accused's defense counsel as opportunity was provided but not exercised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sankari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case