SI OF POLICE THEVOOR PS vs RAMESH — 40/2026
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 06th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSA090003462026
e-Filing Number
20-02-2026
Filing Number
346/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
40/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Sankari
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
202
Police Station
Thevoor
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI OF POLICE THEVOOR PS (Police Station)
Adv. Si of police Thevoor
Respondent(s)
RAMESH
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 27-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted Ramesh of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act for allegedly selling liquor bottles without license, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified critical procedural failures: absence of independent witnesses at the public seizure, no chemical analysis confirming the bottles contained alcohol, missing mandatory seizure documentation, and lack of evidence proving the possession was for sale rather than personal consumption permitted under state rules. The accused was released and case property ordered destroyed after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted Ramesh of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act for allegedly selling liquor bottles without license, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified critical procedural failures: absence of independent witnesses at the public seizure, no chemical analysis confirming the bottles contained alcohol, missing mandatory seizure documentation, and lack of evidence proving the possession was for sale rather than personal consumption permitted under state rules. The accused was released and case property ordered destroyed after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts