Rajkumar N.A. vs Sakthivel — 396/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 27-Mar-2026

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNSA090002042024

e-Filing Number

29-01-2024

Filing Number

204/2024

Filing Date

29-Feb-2024

Registration No

396/2024

Registration Date

14-May-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sankari

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajkumar N.A.

    Adv. SELVARAJA. K.S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sakthivel

Case History

  1. 27-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  3. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  5. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  6. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  7. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  8. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  9. 30-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Court Order Summary Case: STC No. 396/2024, Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Sankari (30.10.2025) Outcome: This is a witness deposition record (not a final order) documenting cross-examination of witness Rajkumar in a criminal case. The witness testified regarding financial transactions, a house construction loan of ₹10 lakhs from Punjab National Bank, monthly EMI payments of ₹11,500, and disputed claims about money allegedly given to the accused. The witness denied several allegations made during examination, stating certain claims were false and contradicted his earlier statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  11. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  12. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  13. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  14. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  15. 29-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  16. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  17. 25-Jul-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  18. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  19. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  20. 26-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  21. 05-Jun-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  22. 05-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  23. 03-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  24. 06-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  25. 06-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  26. 09-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  27. 06-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  28. 07-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  29. 03-Oct-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  30. 27-Sep-2024

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  31. 16-Aug-2024

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  32. 05-Jul-2024

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

  33. 14-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 29-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 396/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: STC No. 396/2024, Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Sankari (30.10.2025) Outcome: This is a witness deposition record (not a final order) documenting cross-examination of witness Rajkumar in a criminal case. The witness testified regarding financial transactions, a house construction loan of ₹10 lakhs from Punjab National Bank, monthly EMI payments of ₹11,500, and disputed claims about money allegedly given to the accused. The witness denied several allegations made during examination, stating certain claims were false and contradicted his earlier statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case