FOOD SAFETY OFFICER KONGANAPURAM AND MAGUDANCHAVADI BLOCK vs SYED ABBAS KHAN(Absconding) — 137/2026
Case under Food Safety and Standards Act 2006 Section 59(i). Disposed: Uncontested--Judgement on admission on 06th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNSA090000832026
e-Filing Number
11-01-2026
Filing Number
83/2026
Filing Date
12-01-2026
Registration No
137/2026
Registration Date
29-01-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Sankari
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Sankari
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Judgement on admission
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
FOOD SAFETY OFFICER KONGANAPURAM AND MAGUDANCHAVADI BLOCK
Adv. G R JEEVITHA
Respondent(s)
SYED ABBAS KHAN(Absconding)
SYED MOHAMMED BISMI
DEVI B
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Sankari
Disposed
Appearance
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 02-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 17-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 29-01-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Sankari convicted Accused Nos. 2 and 3 under Section 59(i) of the Food Safety and Standards Act after they admitted to the offence. As first-time offenders, the court imposed lenient sentences of one day simple imprisonment till court rising and a fine of Rs. 5,000 each (with one month imprisonment in default) to give them an opportunity to reform and deter future violations. The case against Accused No. 1 was separated for separate disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Sankari convicted Accused Nos. 2 and 3 under Section 59(i) of the Food Safety and Standards Act after they admitted to the offence. As first-time offenders, the court imposed lenient sentences of one day simple imprisonment till court rising and a fine of Rs. 5,000 each (with one month imprisonment in default) to give them an opportunity to reform and deter future violations. The case against Accused No. 1 was separated for separate disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts