Ramasamy. R vs Vaitheeswara Varma. S.K. and 25 others Advocate - CHRISTOPHER ASIRVATHAM PRABAKAR . S — 200225/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR7Ru1to6. Status: Stay. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNSA080002522016
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
Filing Number
200225/2016
Filing Date
29-11-2016
Registration No
200225/2016
Registration Date
29-11-2016
Court
District Munsif Court, Sankari
Judge
2-District Munsif, Sankari
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramasamy. R
Adv. KAILASSANATHAN.A
Respondent(s)
Vaitheeswara Varma. S.K. and 25 others Advocate - CHRISTOPHER ASIRVATHAM PRABAKAR . S
Senthilkumar.N -D2
Adv. Exparte
Ramya -D3
Adv. CHRISTOPHER ASIRVATHAM PRABAKAR . S
Natarajan.R -D4
Adv. Exparte
Geethamahesu. J -D5
Adv. CHRISTOPHER ASIRVATHAM PRABAKAR . S
Ramakrishnan. K -D6
Adv. Exparte
Kavitha.T -D7
Saravanabhavan. N -D8
Anbalagan.M -D9
Adv. Exparte
Santhosam.S -D10
Adv. Exparte
Kalaiselvi.S -D11
Adv. CHRISTOPHER ASIRVATHAM PRABAKAR . S
Saroja -D12
Adv. CHRISTOPHER ASIRVATHAM PRABAKAR . S
Sudhakar.R -D13
Adv. Exparte
Duraisamy -D14
Adv. CHRISTOPHER ASIRVATHAM PRABAKAR . S
Nagarajan.G -D15
Adv. Exparte
Devendiran.M -D16
Adv. Exparte
Govindan.P -D17
Adv. CHRISTOPHER ASIRVATHAM PRABAKAR . S
Kandaperumal. S -D18
Adv. Exparte
Chinnannan.A -D19
Parameswari.S -D20
Adv. CHRISTOPHER ASIRVATHAM PRABAKAR . S
Natarajan. P -D21
Adv. Exparte
Mohanasundaram.M -D22
Hariharasudhan.K -D23
Sangeetha.P -D24
Adv. CHRISTOPHER ASIRVATHAM PRABAKAR . S
Rajamanickam.P -D25
Adv. CHRISTOPHER ASIRVATHAM PRABAKAR . S
Vasantha.S -D26
Adv. CHRISTOPHER ASIRVATHAM PRABAKAR . S
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Sankari
Stay
Stay
Stay
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Stay |
| 29-01-2026 | Stay |
| 08-12-2025 | Stay |
| 25-11-2025 | IA Pending |
| 24-11-2025 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Munsif Court, Sankari allowed the interlocutory application and stayed the trial of O.S. No. 225/2016 (permanent injunction suit) until final disposal of the earlier partition suit O.S. No. 101/2011 pending before the Subordinate Judge Court. The court found that both suits involve substantially the same property (S. No. 86/1), same issues regarding partition and possession rights, and overlapping parties connected through title, making it necessary under Section 10 of CPC to prevent multiplicity of litigation and conflicting decrees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Munsif Court, Sankari allowed the interlocutory application and stayed the trial of O.S. No. 225/2016 (permanent injunction suit) until final disposal of the earlier partition suit O.S. No. 101/2011 pending before the Subordinate Judge Court. The court found that both suits involve substantially the same property (S. No. 86/1), same issues regarding partition and possession rights, and overlapping parties connected through title, making it necessary under Section 10 of CPC to prevent multiplicity of litigation and conflicting decrees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts