Arulmigu Annamalaiyar Thirukovil Rep Natarajan.A vs Maheswari and one another Advocate - MANI P N — 200210/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O7R1to6ofC.P.C. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNSA080002472015
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
Filing Number
200210/2015
Filing Date
17-08-2015
Registration No
200210/2015
Registration Date
17-08-2015
Court
District Munsif Court, Sankari
Judge
2-District Munsif, Sankari
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arulmigu Annamalaiyar Thirukovil Rep Natarajan.A
Adv. CHRISTOPHER. S
Arulkumar.N
Adv. CHRISTOPHER. S
Respondent(s)
Maheswari and one another Advocate - MANI P N
Cginnappan
Adv. MANI P N
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Sankari
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 04-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 17-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 07-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 28-01-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Munsif Court of Sankari allowed two interlocutory applications (I.A.13/2025 and I.A.14/2025), permitting the plaintiffs to further cross-examine defendant witness DW1 (Maheswari) and reopen the defendants' evidence. The court found that despite the two-year delay since the original cross-examination concluded in October 2023, allowing the plaintiffs to put additional questions based on recently obtained documents serves the interests of justice without causing serious prejudice to the respondents. The petitions were allowed on payment of costs of Rs.250 each to the respondents, with compliance ordered by March 12, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Munsif Court of Sankari allowed two interlocutory applications (I.A.13/2025 and I.A.14/2025), permitting the plaintiffs to further cross-examine defendant witness DW1 (Maheswari) and reopen the defendants' evidence. The court found that despite the two-year delay since the original cross-examination concluded in October 2023, allowing the plaintiffs to put additional questions based on recently obtained documents serves the interests of justice without causing serious prejudice to the respondents. The petitions were allowed on payment of costs of Rs.250 each to the respondents, with compliance ordered by March 12, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts