Arulmurugan vs Balu A.A. Advocate - Sekar.R — 200250/2012
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/or.VIIR.1to14ofCPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNSA080001462012
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
200250/2012
Filing Date
06-08-2012
Registration No
200250/2012
Registration Date
06-08-2012
Court
District Munsif Court, Sankari
Judge
2-District Munsif, Sankari
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arulmurugan
Adv. Sivakumar S.
Respondent(s)
Balu A.A. Advocate - Sekar.R
Ganapathy G.
Adv. Sekar.R
Chinnaraju M.
Adv. Sekar.R
The Sub Registrar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Sankari
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 21-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Original Case No. 250/2012 before the District Civil Court, Sangakiri (dated 06.03.2026), cross-examination of the defendant (Chinnarajah) was continued on his oath regarding property ownership claims. The court examined discrepancies in the defendant's statements concerning the property title, intermediate petitions filed (IA 27/2015 and IA 11/2017), and allegations of fraudulent documents and collusion in transferring the property. The cross-examination concluded at 12:45 PM, with the witness's testimony transcribed, read over, and confirmed by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Original Case No. 250/2012 before the District Civil Court, Sangakiri (dated 06.03.2026), cross-examination of the defendant (Chinnarajah) was continued on his oath regarding property ownership claims. The court examined discrepancies in the defendant's statements concerning the property title, intermediate petitions filed (IA 27/2015 and IA 11/2017), and allegations of fraudulent documents and collusion in transferring the property. The cross-examination concluded at 12:45 PM, with the witness's testimony transcribed, read over, and confirmed by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts