K. Papathi vs K. Prakash — 98/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7R.1. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA080001252024
Filing Number
137/2024
Filing Date
20-Sep-2024
Registration No
98/2024
Registration Date
20-Sep-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Sankari
Judge
2-District Munsif, Sankari
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.K. Papathi
Adv. S B ARULDASHJAMESH
Respondent(s)
-
1.K. Prakash
Case History
-
08-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Mar-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Sankari
-
30-Jan-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Sankari
-
09-Dec-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Sankari
-
18-Nov-2025
Issues
District Munsif, Sankari
-
06-Oct-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Sankari
-
28-Aug-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Sankari
-
05-Aug-2025
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The District Munsif Court, Sankari dismissed the plaintiff's interlocutory application seeking ad-interim injunction to restrain the defendant from constructing on disputed joint family property. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case or exclusive possession over the specific land parcel, and that the balance of convenience favored the defendant who lawfully purchased the property through registered sale deeds from co-sharers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Aug-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Sankari
-
21-Jul-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Sankari
-
10-Jul-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Sankari
-
25-Jun-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Sankari
-
23-Apr-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Sankari
-
19-Feb-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Sankari
-
02-Jan-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Sankari
-
25-Nov-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif, Sankari
-
24-Oct-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif, Sankari
-
20-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 98/2024
Summary The District Munsif Court, Sankari dismissed the plaintiff's interlocutory application seeking ad-interim injunction to restrain the defendant from constructing on disputed joint family property. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case or exclusive possession over the specific land parcel, and that the balance of convenience favored the defendant who lawfully purchased the property through registered sale deeds from co-sharers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts