Ayyamperumal and another vs The Special Officer, Vaikutham Panchayat, Sankari TK and another Advocate - SUBRAMANI. R — 200088/2018
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section ORVIIR1To6. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA080000902018
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200088/2018
Filing Date
13-06-2018
Registration No
200088/2018
Registration Date
20-06-2018
Court
District Munsif Court, Sankari
Judge
2-District Munsif, Sankari
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ayyamperumal and another
Adv. ARTHANARI. K.
Lakshmi -P.2
Adv. ARTHANARI. K.
Respondent(s)
The Special Officer, Vaikutham Panchayat, Sankari TK and another Advocate - SUBRAMANI. R
The Block Development Officer, Macdonald Choultry Panchayat Union, Sankari TK, Salem Dt., -D.2
Adv. Subramani .R
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Sankari
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Trial | |
| 27-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 10-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 06-02-2026 | Trial | |
| 18-12-2025 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Petition Allowed The District Munsif Court, Sankari granted the petition filed by the 1st Defendant (President, Vaikuntham Village Panchayat) seeking to set aside the ex parte order passed on 05.03.2024 due to non-appearance. The court found the defendant's explanation—that his two-wheeler broke down while traveling to court, causing unavoidable delay—to be prima facie plausible, and noted he promptly filed the application on the same day. The court held that denying him the opportunity to contest the suit would constitute denial of natural justice, especially since the main suit (O.S.88/2018) remains in trial stage. The application was allowed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Petition Allowed The District Munsif Court, Sankari granted the petition filed by the 1st Defendant (President, Vaikuntham Village Panchayat) seeking to set aside the ex parte order passed on 05.03.2024 due to non-appearance. The court found the defendant's explanation—that his two-wheeler broke down while traveling to court, causing unavoidable delay—to be prima facie plausible, and noted he promptly filed the application on the same day. The court held that denying him the opportunity to contest the suit would constitute denial of natural justice, especially since the main suit (O.S.88/2018) remains in trial stage. The application was allowed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts