Pachiammal and two others vs Sekar S.K. and another Advocate - CHRISTOPHER. S — 200062/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.VIIRules1to6ofCPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNSA080000622016
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
200062/2016
Filing Date
05-03-2016
Registration No
200062/2016
Registration Date
05-03-2016
Court
District Munsif Court, Sankari
Judge
2-District Munsif, Sankari
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pachiammal and two others
Adv. Selvaraj M.P.
Ravikumar
Adv. Selvaraj M.P.
Rajamani
Adv. Selvaraj M.P.
Respondent(s)
Sekar S.K. and another Advocate - CHRISTOPHER. S
Venkateswaran I.
Adv. CHRISTOPHER. S
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Sankari
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a cross-examination transcript from Original Case No. 62/2016 in the Sangakkiri District Court (dated 05.03.2026), recorded in Tamil. The document contains the cross-examination of defendant Vengateswaran regarding a property dispute involving 42 cents of land. The witness testified about land ownership claims, conflicting property documents showing either 92 or 97½ cents, and assertions that he received only 42 cents as a gift from the first defendant. No final court order/judgment is rendered in this document—it is merely a record of the cross-examination proceedings conducted on 05.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a cross-examination transcript from Original Case No. 62/2016 in the Sangakkiri District Court (dated 05.03.2026), recorded in Tamil. The document contains the cross-examination of defendant Vengateswaran regarding a property dispute involving 42 cents of land. The witness testified about land ownership claims, conflicting property documents showing either 92 or 97½ cents, and assertions that he received only 42 cents as a gift from the first defendant. No final court order/judgment is rendered in this document—it is merely a record of the cross-examination proceedings conducted on 05.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts