Krishnan vs Ramasamy Advocate - ARTHANARI. K. — 200310/2012
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/OVIIRules1to6ofCPC. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNSA080000382012
Next Hearing
16th March 2026
Filing Number
200310/2012
Filing Date
13-09-2012
Registration No
200310/2012
Registration Date
13-09-2012
Court
District Munsif Court, Sankari
Judge
2-District Munsif, Sankari
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Krishnan
Adv. RAMASAMY. R.
Respondent(s)
Ramasamy Advocate - ARTHANARI. K.
Parvathy
Subramanian
Seerangammal
Periyasamy
Adv. ARTHANARI. K.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Sankari
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
Amendment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 26-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 03-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 20-01-2026 | IA Pending |
| 16-12-2025 | Amendment |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Petition Allowed (with Conditions) The District Munsif Court, Sankari allowed the petitioner's application to recall Witness DW1 for cross-examination in partition and injunction suit O.S.310/2012. The court found that the petitioner, as plaintiff, should be given sufficient opportunity to prove his case. However, to compensate respondents for hardship caused by the delay, the petitioner was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 500 to respondents 5-7 on or before September 14, 2023, failing which the petition would stand dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Petition Allowed (with Conditions) The District Munsif Court, Sankari allowed the petitioner's application to recall Witness DW1 for cross-examination in partition and injunction suit O.S.310/2012. The court found that the petitioner, as plaintiff, should be given sufficient opportunity to prove his case. However, to compensate respondents for hardship caused by the delay, the petitioner was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 500 to respondents 5-7 on or before September 14, 2023, failing which the petition would stand dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts