Chinnapaiyan vs Chinnu Advocate - MURUGAN S — 200028/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNSA080000282018
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
200028/2018
Filing Date
16-02-2018
Registration No
200028/2018
Registration Date
22-02-2018
Court
District Munsif Court, Sankari
Judge
2-District Munsif, Sankari
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chinnapaiyan
Adv. KALAISELVI A
Respondent(s)
Chinnu Advocate - MURUGAN S
Sithaiyan
Adv. MURUGAN S
Kanagaraj
Adv. MURUGAN S
Boopathy
Adv. MURUGAN S
Assistant Engineer
Adv. SUBRAMANI. R
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Sankari
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 05-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 07-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 21-01-2026 | IA Pending |
| 18-12-2025 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: Original Case No. 28/2018, Ranipet District Civil Court, Chengalpattu Date: December 12, 2023 The court conducted cross-examination of the plaintiff Sithothayan regarding a land dispute involving water canal access and irrigation rights in Govaripatty Agraharam village. The cross-examination focused on contradictions in the plaintiff's testimony regarding land ownership, canal boundaries, and the defendants' actions in relation to the disputed property. Outcome: The cross-examination was completed at 12:13 PM. This appears to be an interlocutory proceeding documenting witness examination rather than a final judgment order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Original Case No. 28/2018, Ranipet District Civil Court, Chengalpattu Date: December 12, 2023 The court conducted cross-examination of the plaintiff Sithothayan regarding a land dispute involving water canal access and irrigation rights in Govaripatty Agraharam village. The cross-examination focused on contradictions in the plaintiff's testimony regarding land ownership, canal boundaries, and the defendants' actions in relation to the disputed property. Outcome: The cross-examination was completed at 12:13 PM. This appears to be an interlocutory proceeding documenting witness examination rather than a final judgment order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts