MariMuthu vs Murugesan Advocate - ARTHANARI. K. — 200021/2002
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.VIIRules1to6ofCPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNSA080000102002
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
200021/2002
Filing Date
23-01-2002
Registration No
200021/2002
Registration Date
23-01-2002
Court
District Munsif Court, Sankari
Judge
2-District Munsif, Sankari
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MariMuthu
Adv. RAMASAMY. R
Respondent(s)
Murugesan Advocate - ARTHANARI. K.
Palanisamy
Adv. ARTHANARI. K.
Chinnathambi
Adv. SUBRAMANI. R
Uthirasamy
Adv. SUBRAMANI. R
Sivakumar
Adv. SUBRAMANI. R
The District Collector,
Adv. Exparte
The Tahsildar,
Adv. Exparte
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Sankari
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Original Case No. 21/2002 at Sankaramangalam District Court, cross-examination of the plaintiff Murukkasan and defendants 2-5 was conducted on 17.02.2026 regarding a property dispute. The plaintiff testified about his father's ownership of the property, a will executed by his grandfather favoring him and his brother, and subsequent possession by defendants 2, 4, and 5 after the grandfather's death. The cross-examination concluded with the witness statement being recorded and authenticated before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Original Case No. 21/2002 at Sankaramangalam District Court, cross-examination of the plaintiff Murukkasan and defendants 2-5 was conducted on 17.02.2026 regarding a property dispute. The plaintiff testified about his father's ownership of the property, a will executed by his grandfather favoring him and his brother, and subsequent possession by defendants 2, 4, and 5 after the grandfather's death. The cross-examination concluded with the witness statement being recorded and authenticated before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts