Inspector of Police, ALGSC PS , Salem District vs K.Gopal and 2 others Advocate - RAJAGOPALAN. N. — 6/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 120B,423,468,471,447,341,506(i). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNSA070011102023

Filing Number

12/2020

Filing Date

03-Jan-2020

Registration No

6/2020

Registration Date

20-Oct-2023

Court

Sub Court, Sankari

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Last updated 08-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 120B,423,468,471,447,341,506(i)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, ALGSC PS (Police Station) , Salem District

    Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.K.Gopal and 2 others Advocate - RAJAGOPALAN. N.

  2. 2.MURUGESAN

    Adv. RAJAGOPALAN. N.

  3. 3.THANGAVEL

    Adv. RAJAGOPALAN. N.

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 04-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 21-Jul-2025

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 01-Jul-2025

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge

  12. 16-Jun-2025

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge

  13. 28-Apr-2025

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  14. 07-Apr-2025

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  15. 10-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  16. 17-Feb-2025

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  17. 21-Jan-2025

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  18. 16-Dec-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  19. 02-Dec-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  20. 21-Oct-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  21. 07-Oct-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  22. 17-Sep-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  23. 20-Aug-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  24. 30-Jul-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 19-Jun-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  26. 19-Jun-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This is a deposition of witness (PW.2) in Case No. SC.6/2020 before the Subordinate Judge, Sankari, recorded on 19.06.2024. The witness testified regarding a property dispute involving a loan taken by her deceased son, subsequent repayment to the creditor, and alleged illegal demolition of six structures on the disputed land using a JCB machine by the accused. The cross-examination by the opposing counsel was waived as the witness, being over 90 years old and in poor health, was unable to effectively participate, resulting in the court closing cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  27. 19-Jun-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  28. 10-Jun-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  29. 16-Apr-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  30. 16-Apr-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  31. 12-Mar-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  32. 06-Feb-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  33. 09-Jan-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge

  34. 18-Dec-2023

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge

  35. 20-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 03-Jan-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2020

casestatus.in Summary

This is a deposition of witness (PW.2) in Case No. SC.6/2020 before the Subordinate Judge, Sankari, recorded on 19.06.2024. The witness testified regarding a property dispute involving a loan taken by her deceased son, subsequent repayment to the creditor, and alleged illegal demolition of six structures on the disputed land using a JCB machine by the accused. The cross-examination by the opposing counsel was waived as the witness, being over 90 years old and in poor health, was unable to effectively participate, resulting in the court closing cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case