SENTHIL vs SUMATHI — 65/2023

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section ORDERVIIRULES1TO6,. Disposed: Uncontested--Partially Allowed on 08th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSA070002812023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

30-03-2023

Filing Number

316/2023

Filing Date

28-03-2023

Registration No

65/2023

Registration Date

28-03-2023

Court

Sub Court, Sankari

Judge

1-Subordinate Judge

Decision Date

08th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Partially Allowed

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section ORDERVIIRULES1TO6,

Petitioner(s)

SENTHIL

Adv. SRIDHAR K

Respondent(s)

SUMATHI

SATHYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Subordinate Judge

08-04-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

Judgement

18-03-2026

Arguments

10-03-2026

Arguments

02-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

08-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court partially allowed the plaintiff's suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement. The court directed the defendants to execute a registered sale deed for the property within three months after receiving the remaining purchase amount of Rs. 50,000, and granted an injunction preventing the defendants from creating any encumbrance on the property. The court rejected the alternative claim for recovery of the advance amount of Rs. 1,50,000 with 18% interest, holding that specific performance was the appropriate remedy since the sale agreement was genuine and the plaintiff had paid the advance in good faith. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court partially allowed the plaintiff's suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement. The court directed the defendants to execute a registered sale deed for the property within three months after receiving the remaining purchase amount of Rs. 50,000, and granted an injunction preventing the defendants from creating any encumbrance on the property. The court rejected the alternative claim for recovery of the advance amount of Rs. 1,50,000 with 18% interest, holding that specific performance was the appropriate remedy since the sale agreement was genuine and the plaintiff had paid the advance in good faith. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Sankari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case