SENTHIL vs SUMATHI — 65/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDERVIIRULES1TO6. Disposed: Uncontested--Partially Allowed on 08th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA070002812023
e-Filing Number
30-03-2023
Filing Number
316/2023
Filing Date
28-Mar-2023
Registration No
65/2023
Registration Date
28-Mar-2023
Court
Sub Court, Sankari
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Partially Allowed
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SENTHIL
Adv. SRIDHAR K
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUMATHI
-
2.SATHYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The court partially allowed the plaintiff's suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement. The court directed the defendants to execute a registered sale deed for the property within three months after receiving the remaining purchase amount of Rs. 50,000, and granted an injunction preventing the defendants from creating any encumbrance on the property. The court rejected the alternative claim for recovery of the advance amount of Rs. 1,50,000 with 18% interest, holding that specific performance was the appropriate remedy since the sale agreement was genuine and the plaintiff had paid the advance in good faith. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
Subordinate Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Judgement
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Nov-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Nov-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Oct-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Sep-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Aug-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Aug-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
23-Jul-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Jun-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
28-Apr-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Feb-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Feb-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
03-Feb-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Jan-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Dec-2024
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
11-Nov-2024
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
23-Oct-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
23-Oct-2024
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
30-Sep-2024
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Aug-2024
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Jul-2024
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Apr-2024
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
05-Mar-2024
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Jan-2024
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
11-Dec-2023
Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Nov-2023
Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
11-Sep-2023
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
25-Jul-2023
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
28-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 65/2023
Summary The court partially allowed the plaintiff's suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement. The court directed the defendants to execute a registered sale deed for the property within three months after receiving the remaining purchase amount of Rs. 50,000, and granted an injunction preventing the defendants from creating any encumbrance on the property. The court rejected the alternative claim for recovery of the advance amount of Rs. 1,50,000 with 18% interest, holding that specific performance was the appropriate remedy since the sale agreement was genuine and the plaintiff had paid the advance in good faith. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts