Muruganantham vs Mariammal Advocate - KASILINGAM K — 100106/2013
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section UnderOrderVIIRules1to6ofCPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNSA070000082013
Filing Number
100106/2013
Filing Date
03-Jul-2013
Registration No
100106/2013
Registration Date
03-Jul-2013
Court
Sub Court, Sankari
Judge
1-Subordinate Judge
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Muruganantham
Adv. CHANDRAN N
-
2.Gopalsamy
Adv. CHANDRAN N
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mariammal Advocate - KASILINGAM K
-
2.Solaiappan
Adv. KASILINGAM K
-
3.Palaniammal
-
4.Muniappan
-
5.Pavayee
-
6.Mani
-
7.Chinnathayee
Case History
-
15-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
29-Apr-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Nov-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Sep-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
05-Aug-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
15-Jul-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Jul-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Jun-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
22-Apr-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
25-Mar-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
11-Mar-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Feb-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Jan-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Jan-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Dec-2024
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
25-Nov-2024
Additional Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
05-Nov-2024
Additional Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
29-Oct-2024
Issue of Process
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Sep-2024
Issue of Process
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Sep-2024
Issue of Process
Subordinate Judge
-
31-Jul-2024
Issue of Process
Subordinate Judge
-
26-Jun-2024
Issue of Process
Subordinate Judge
-
30-Apr-2024
Issue of Process
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Apr-2024
Issue of Process
Subordinate Judge
-
20-Mar-2024
Amendment
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Mar-2024
Amendment
Subordinate Judge
-
26-Feb-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Feb-2024
Steps
Subordinate Judge
-
05-Feb-2024
Steps
Subordinate Judge
-
24-Jan-2024
Steps
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Dec-2023
Steps
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Nov-2023
Steps
Subordinate Judge
-
26-Sep-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
26-Jul-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Jun-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
28-Feb-2023
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Dec-2022
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Sep-2022
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Jun-2022
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
08-Mar-2022
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Mar-2022
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Feb-2022
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Jan-2022
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Dec-2021
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Dec-2021
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
20-Oct-2021
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
20-Sep-2021
Copy of DepositionView PDF
This is a civil suit (OS No. 106/2013) heard in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Sankari on 20.09.2021, concerning a property dispute over land (Thawaah Sastha). The court examined the plaintiff's (Gopalsamy's) cross-examination testimony regarding ownership claims, documentary evidence, and possession of the disputed property. The judgment extensively addresses inconsistencies in the plaintiff's testimony regarding competing title deeds, prior mortgages to third parties, and the validity of documents dated 9.4.2008 and 13.1.2013. The court rejected most of the plaintiff's contentions and concluded that based on the evidence and testimony, the plaintiff failed to establish valid ownership rights to the entire disputed property and rejected the claim for partition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Sep-2021
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Sep-2021
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Aug-2021
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Jul-2021
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Jun-2021
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
30-Mar-2021
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
24-Feb-2021
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Jan-2021
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Dec-2020
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
08-Dec-2020
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
30-Nov-2020
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
25-Nov-2020
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
29-Sep-2020
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
28-Sep-2020
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Sep-2020
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
29-Jul-2020
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Jun-2020
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Apr-2020
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
20-Mar-2020
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Mar-2020
Additional Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
19-Feb-2020
Additional Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Feb-2020
Additional Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
22-Jan-2020
Additional Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Jan-2020
Additional Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Dec-2019
Additional Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Dec-2019
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
26-Nov-2019
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
11-Nov-2019
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
23-Oct-2019
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Oct-2019
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
15-Oct-2019
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
30-Sep-2019
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
23-Sep-2019
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
23-Sep-2019
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
11-Sep-2019
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
14-Aug-2019
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Aug-2019
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Aug-2019
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
15-Apr-2019
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Mar-2019
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
29-Jan-2019
Amendment
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Nov-2018
Amendment
Subordinate Judge
-
22-Oct-2018
Amendment
Subordinate Judge
-
20-Aug-2018
Amendment
Subordinate Judge
-
20-Jun-2018
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Apr-2018
Steps
Subordinate Judge
-
26-Mar-2018
Steps
Subordinate Judge
-
22-Jan-2018
Steps
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Oct-2017
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Aug-2017
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
08-Mar-2017
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
08-Feb-2017
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Nov-2016
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Oct-2016
Service Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
22-Aug-2016
Amendment
Subordinate Judge
-
28-Jun-2016
Amendment
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Jun-2016
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
14-Mar-2016
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
29-Feb-2016
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Jan-2016
For further Proceedings
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Jan-2016
Steps
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Nov-2015
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
30-Sep-2015
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Sep-2015
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Aug-2015
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
26-Jun-2015
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
19-Jun-2015
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Jun-2015
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
24-Apr-2015
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
22-Apr-2015
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Apr-2015
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Apr-2015
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
20-Mar-2015
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
20-Jan-2015
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
20-Nov-2014
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Sep-2014
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Aug-2014
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jul-2013
Case filed
Registration No. 100106/2013
This is a civil suit (OS No. 106/2013) heard in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Sankari on 20.09.2021, concerning a property dispute over land (Thawaah Sastha). The court examined the plaintiff's (Gopalsamy's) cross-examination testimony regarding ownership claims, documentary evidence, and possession of the disputed property. The judgment extensively addresses inconsistencies in the plaintiff's testimony regarding competing title deeds, prior mortgages to third parties, and the validity of documents dated 9.4.2008 and 13.1.2013. The court rejected most of the plaintiff's contentions and concluded that based on the evidence and testimony, the plaintiff failed to establish valid ownership rights to the entire disputed property and rejected the claim for partition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts