R. Kanmani and 3 others vs The Managing Director, Subramaniya Siva Co-Operative Sugar Mill Ltd., — 46/2022

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C(2). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 19-May-2026 this date has passed

CLP - Claim Petition

CNR: TNSA020001092022

Filing Number

109/2022

Filing Date

18-Jul-2022

Registration No

46/2022

Registration Date

18-Jul-2022

Court

Labour Court, Salem

Judge

3-Presiding Officer, Labour Court

Last updated 09-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R. Kanmani and 3 others

    Adv. PON RAMANI P

  2. 2.Harini

    Adv. PON RAMANI P

  3. 3.Geethasri

    Adv. PON RAMANI P

  4. 4.C. Aravind

    Adv. PON RAMANI P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Managing Director, Subramaniya Siva Co-Operative Sugar Mill Ltd.,

Case History

  1. 19-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  5. 18-Dec-2025

    Reopen

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  6. 24-Nov-2025

    Reopen

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  7. 23-Oct-2025

    Reopen

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  8. 30-Sep-2025

    Reopen

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  9. 18-Sep-2025

    Reopen

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  10. 26-Aug-2025

    Reopen

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  11. 31-Jul-2025

    Reopen

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  12. 21-Jul-2025

    Reopen

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  13. 26-Jun-2025

    Reopen

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  14. 05-Jun-2025

    Orders

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  15. 29-May-2025

    Orders

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  16. 14-May-2025

    Orders

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  17. 30-Apr-2025

    Orders

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  18. 25-Apr-2025

    Orders

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  19. 04-Apr-2025

    Orders

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  20. 21-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  21. 07-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  22. 03-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  23. 22-Nov-2024

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  24. 08-Nov-2024

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  25. 04-Oct-2024

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  26. 20-Sep-2024

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  27. 02-Aug-2024

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  28. 05-Jul-2024

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  29. 07-Jun-2024

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  30. 17-May-2024

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  31. 19-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  32. 15-Mar-2024

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  33. 16-Feb-2024

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  34. 05-Jan-2024

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  35. 01-Dec-2023

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  36. 20-Oct-2023

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  37. 15-Sep-2023

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  38. 18-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  39. 21-Jul-2023

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: The Labour Court, Salem (C.P. No. 46 of 2022) dismissed the petition on 21.07.2023. The court rejected the claimant's demands for unpaid wages and family protection fund benefits, finding that no documentary evidence substantiated the claimed amounts and that certain exhibits (including Ex.R5) were deemed unreliable or fabricated. The court also declined to award interest on the disputed wage amounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  40. 21-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  41. 07-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  42. 16-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  43. 19-May-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  44. 24-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  45. 03-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  46. 17-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  47. 20-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  48. 30-Dec-2022

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  49. 02-Dec-2022

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  50. 18-Nov-2022

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  51. 04-Nov-2022

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  52. 30-Sep-2022

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  53. 02-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  54. 18-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 46/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Labour Court, Salem (C.P. No. 46 of 2022) dismissed the petition on 21.07.2023. The court rejected the claimant's demands for unpaid wages and family protection fund benefits, finding that no documentary evidence substantiated the claimed amounts and that certain exhibits (including Ex.R5) were deemed unreliable or fabricated. The court also declined to award interest on the disputed wage amounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case