D.P. Murugesh vs The General Manager, Indigra Ex-ports Pvt.Ltd., — 22/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 33C(2). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 17-Apr-2026 this date has passed

CLP - Claim Petition

CNR: TNSA020000812021

Filing Number

81/2021

Filing Date

30-Apr-2021

Registration No

22/2021

Registration Date

13-Jul-2021

Court

Labour Court, Salem

Judge

3-Presiding Officer, Labour Court

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 33C(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.D.P. Murugesh

    Adv. Pon. Ramani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The General Manager, Indigra Ex-ports Pvt.Ltd.,

Case History

  1. 17-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  3. 19-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  4. 17-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  5. 19-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  6. 22-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  7. 01-Aug-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary: The Labour Court, Salem (Camp Court at Dharmapuri) in C.P. No. 22 of 2021 dismissed the petition filed by the worker on 01.08.2025. The court found that the company's retrenchment of employees lacked proper authorization under Section 33(2)C of the Industrial Disputes Act and violated statutory procedures, but ruled that the petitioner was not entitled to relief as the retrenchment had already been completed under two pending industrial cases. No further hearing was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 01-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  9. 06-Jun-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  10. 06-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  11. 16-May-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  12. 02-May-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  13. 02-May-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  14. 04-Apr-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  15. 07-Mar-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  16. 21-Feb-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  17. 07-Feb-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  18. 03-Jan-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  19. 22-Nov-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  20. 08-Nov-2024

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  21. 04-Oct-2024

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  22. 20-Sep-2024

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  23. 16-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  24. 19-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  25. 21-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  26. 03-May-2024

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  27. 05-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  28. 01-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  29. 02-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  30. 15-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  31. 03-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  32. 06-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  33. 01-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  34. 18-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  35. 21-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  36. 07-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  37. 16-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  38. 19-May-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  39. 21-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  40. 03-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  41. 17-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  42. 03-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  43. 06-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  44. 16-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  45. 18-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  46. 14-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  47. 14-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  48. 16-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  49. 02-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  50. 05-Aug-2022

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  51. 22-Jul-2022

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  52. 08-Jul-2022

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  53. 03-Jun-2022

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  54. 06-May-2022

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  55. 01-Apr-2022

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  56. 18-Mar-2022

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  57. 04-Feb-2022

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  58. 07-Jan-2022

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  59. 03-Dec-2021

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  60. 22-Oct-2021

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  61. 17-Sep-2021

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Labour Court

  62. 06-Aug-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  63. 30-Apr-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 22/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Labour Court, Salem (Camp Court at Dharmapuri) in C.P. No. 22 of 2021 dismissed the petition filed by the worker on 01.08.2025. The court found that the company's retrenchment of employees lacked proper authorization under Section 33(2)C of the Industrial Disputes Act and violated statutory procedures, but ruled that the petitioner was not entitled to relief as the retrenchment had already been completed under two pending industrial cases. No further hearing was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case