M. Veerakrishan vs The Management, TNSTC, Dharmapuri Zonal — 5/2020
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
ID - Industrial Disputes
CNR: TNSA020000202020
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
Filing Number
20/2020
Filing Date
29-01-2020
Registration No
5/2020
Registration Date
29-01-2020
Court
Labour Court, Salem
Judge
3-Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M. Veerakrishan
Adv. PON RAMANI P
Respondent(s)
The Management, TNSTC, Dharmapuri Zonal
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 17-10-2025 | Evidence |
| 19-09-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary The Labour Court, Salem (Camp Court at Dharmapuri) in I.D. No. 5 of 2020, dated 06.02.2026, recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of witness M. Durai Raj. The court found the witness's testimony credible, establishing that he was not in the Disciplinary Action Division when the petitioner was subjected to disciplinary proceedings in October 2009, and noted inconsistencies in the opposing party's documentary evidence. No cross-examination by the opposing party was permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Labour Court, Salem (Camp Court at Dharmapuri) in I.D. No. 5 of 2020, dated 06.02.2026, recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of witness M. Durai Raj. The court found the witness's testimony credible, establishing that he was not in the Disciplinary Action Division when the petitioner was subjected to disciplinary proceedings in October 2009, and noted inconsistencies in the opposing party's documentary evidence. No cross-examination by the opposing party was permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts