M. Veerakrishan vs The Management, TNSTC, Dharmapuri Zonal — 5/2020
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
ID - Industrial Disputes
CNR: TNSA020000202020
Filing Number
20/2020
Filing Date
29-Jan-2020
Registration No
5/2020
Registration Date
29-Jan-2020
Court
Labour Court, Salem
Judge
3-Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Last updated 19-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M. Veerakrishan
Adv. PON RAMANI P
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Management, TNSTC, Dharmapuri Zonal
Case History
-
08-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
06-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Summary The Labour Court, Salem (Camp Court at Dharmapuri) in I.D. No. 5 of 2020, dated 06.02.2026, recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of witness M. Durai Raj. The court found the witness's testimony credible, establishing that he was not in the Disciplinary Action Division when the petitioner was subjected to disciplinary proceedings in October 2009, and noted inconsistencies in the opposing party's documentary evidence. No cross-examination by the opposing party was permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
19-Sep-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
22-Aug-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
01-Aug-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
01-Aug-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
18-Jul-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
20-Jun-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
06-Jun-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
16-May-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
02-May-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
02-May-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
04-Apr-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
04-Apr-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
07-Mar-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
21-Feb-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
07-Feb-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
03-Jan-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
22-Nov-2024
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
08-Nov-2024
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
04-Oct-2024
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
02-Aug-2024
Appearance
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
05-Jul-2024
Appearance
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
07-Jun-2024
Appearance
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
17-May-2024
Appearance
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
19-Apr-2024
Appearance
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
15-Mar-2024
Appearance
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
16-Feb-2024
Appearance
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
05-Jan-2024
Appearance
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
01-Dec-2023
Appearance
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
20-Oct-2023
Appearance
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
15-Sep-2023
Appearance
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
18-Aug-2023
Appearance
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
21-Jul-2023
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
07-Jul-2023
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
16-Jun-2023
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
19-May-2023
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
21-Apr-2023
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
24-Mar-2023
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
03-Mar-2023
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
17-Feb-2023
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
03-Feb-2023
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
20-Jan-2023
Orders
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
16-Dec-2022
Orders
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
18-Nov-2022
Orders
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
01-Nov-2022
Orders
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
03-Oct-2022
Orders
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
16-Sep-2022
Orders
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
02-Sep-2022
Orders
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
05-Aug-2022
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
08-Jul-2022
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
03-Jun-2022
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
20-May-2022
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
22-Apr-2022
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
04-Mar-2022
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
04-Feb-2022
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
07-Jan-2022
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
03-Dec-2021
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
22-Oct-2021
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
01-Oct-2021
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
06-Aug-2021
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
02-Jul-2021
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
04-Jun-2021
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
23-Apr-2021
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
19-Mar-2021
Counter
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
05-Feb-2021
Counter
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
08-Jan-2021
Counter
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
06-Nov-2020
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
09-Oct-2020
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
04-Sep-2020
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
07-Aug-2020
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
03-Jul-2020
Service Pending
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
05-Jun-2020
Service Pending
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
08-May-2020
Service Pending
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
27-Apr-2020
Service Pending
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
03-Apr-2020
Service Pending
Presiding Officer, Labour Court
-
06-Mar-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jan-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 5/2020
Summary The Labour Court, Salem (Camp Court at Dharmapuri) in I.D. No. 5 of 2020, dated 06.02.2026, recorded the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of witness M. Durai Raj. The court found the witness's testimony credible, establishing that he was not in the Disciplinary Action Division when the petitioner was subjected to disciplinary proceedings in October 2009, and noted inconsistencies in the opposing party's documentary evidence. No cross-examination by the opposing party was permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts