Rajammal and 2 others vs The Special District Revenue Officer (LAO), — 307/2022

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 64(2)(b). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 25-Mar-2026

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNSA010065892022

Filing Number

2678/2022

Filing Date

14-Dec-2022

Registration No

307/2022

Registration Date

14-Dec-2022

Court

Principal District Court, Salem

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 64(2)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajammal and 2 others

    Adv. RAJU. P.

  2. 2.Vijaya

  3. 3.Ravichandran

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Special District Revenue Officer (LAO),

Case History

  1. 25-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  3. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  6. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  9. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  10. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  11. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  12. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  13. 09-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  14. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  15. 19-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  16. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  17. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  18. 22-Apr-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Principal District Judge

  19. 16-Apr-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Principal District Judge

  20. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  21. 28-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  22. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  23. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  24. 20-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  25. 04-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  26. 19-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  27. 07-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  28. 16-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  29. 23-Sep-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    In RTROP.No.307/2022 dated 23.09.2024, the Principal District Judge, Salem rejected the petitioner's claims for enhanced compensation regarding agricultural land acquired for a four-lane highway. The court found that the compensation was properly calculated based on the land's valuation at the time of acquisition and comparable adjacent properties, dismissing the petitioner's arguments for reassessment without supporting documentation. No further hearing was ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  30. 23-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  31. 09-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  32. 20-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  33. 06-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  34. 12-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  35. 03-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  36. 20-Jun-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  37. 20-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  38. 23-Apr-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  39. 28-Mar-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  40. 08-Mar-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  41. 20-Feb-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  42. 03-Feb-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  43. 09-Jan-2024

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  44. 07-Dec-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  45. 08-Nov-2023

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  46. 06-Oct-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  47. 05-Sep-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  48. 03-Aug-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  49. 12-Jul-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  50. 12-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  51. 12-Apr-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  52. 04-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  53. 27-Jan-2023

    Service Pending-Notice

    Principal District Judge

  54. 14-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  55. 14-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 307/2022

casestatus.in Summary

In RTROP.No.307/2022 dated 23.09.2024, the Principal District Judge, Salem rejected the petitioner's claims for enhanced compensation regarding agricultural land acquired for a four-lane highway. The court found that the compensation was properly calculated based on the land's valuation at the time of acquisition and comparable adjacent properties, dismissing the petitioner's arguments for reassessment without supporting documentation. No further hearing was ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case