A. Eswaran vs J. Moorthy — 506/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7rule1to6. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 01-Jun-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSA010063142019

Filing Number

2368/2019

Filing Date

12-Nov-2019

Registration No

506/2019

Registration Date

12-Nov-2019

Court

Principal District Court, Salem

Judge

8-III Additional District Judge

Last updated 09-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7rule1to6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A. Eswaran

    Adv. MOHAMED ISMAIL SAIT. M.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.J. Moorthy

Case History

  1. 01-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This is a cross-examination record (O.S.No.506/2019) from the Salem District Court, dated 21-04-2026. The document records the testimony of witness Eswaran regarding a property sale dispute involving a Rs. 12,00,000 advance payment and remaining sale consideration of Rs. 1,10,000. The court examined the witness's credibility on key issues including the existence of a sale agreement, proof of advance payment, notice service to the defendant, and procedural compliance. The order concludes by dismissing the plaintiff's suit against defendant J. Murthi, finding insufficient evidence of a valid sale agreement between them and determining the plaintiff has no right to relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    III Additional District Judge

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    III Additional District Judge

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    III Additional District Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    III Additional District Judge

  7. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    III Additional District Judge

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    III Additional District Judge

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    III Additional District Judge

  10. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    III Additional District Judge

  11. 05-Jan-2026

    Trial

    III Additional District Judge

  12. 06-Dec-2025

    Trial

    III Additional District Judge

  13. 01-Nov-2025

    Issues

    III Additional District Judge

  14. 20-Sep-2025

    Issues

    III Additional District Judge

  15. 08-Aug-2025

    Issues

    III Additional District Judge

  16. 25-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    III Additional District Judge

  17. 08-Jul-2025

    Amendment

    III Additional District Judge

  18. 30-Jun-2025

    Amendment

    III Additional District Judge

  19. 25-Jun-2025

    Amendment

    III Additional District Judge

  20. 19-Jun-2025

    Amendment

    III Additional District Judge

  21. 12-Jun-2025

    Amendment

    III Additional District Judge

  22. 29-Apr-2025

    Amendment

    III Additional District Judge

  23. 17-Apr-2025

    Amendment

    III Additional District Judge

  24. 02-Apr-2025

    Amendment

    III Additional District Judge

  25. 25-Mar-2025

    Amendment

    III Additional District Judge

  26. 12-Mar-2025

    Amendment

    III Additional District Judge

  27. 07-Feb-2025

    Amendment

    III Additional District Judge

  28. 29-Jan-2025

    Amendment

    III Additional District Judge

  29. 20-Jan-2025

    Amendment

    III Additional District Judge

  30. 16-Dec-2024

    Amendment

    III Additional District Judge

  31. 16-Dec-2024

    Restored

    III Additional District Judge

  32. 16-Dec-2024

    Amendment

    III Additional District Judge

  33. 20-Jan-2020

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  34. 20-Jan-2020

    Disposed

    III Additional District Judge

  35. 17-Jan-2020

    Batta

    III Additional District Judge

  36. 17-Dec-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 12-Nov-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 506/2019

casestatus.in Summary

This is a cross-examination record (O.S.No.506/2019) from the Salem District Court, dated 21-04-2026. The document records the testimony of witness Eswaran regarding a property sale dispute involving a Rs. 12,00,000 advance payment and remaining sale consideration of Rs. 1,10,000. The court examined the witness's credibility on key issues including the existence of a sale agreement, proof of advance payment, notice service to the defendant, and procedural compliance. The order concludes by dismissing the plaintiff's suit against defendant J. Murthi, finding insufficient evidence of a valid sale agreement between them and determining the plaintiff has no right to relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case