Seerangan vs Chinnathambi and 14 others — 268/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNSA010060812025
e-Filing Number
07-11-2025
Filing Number
2635/2025
Filing Date
11-Nov-2025
Registration No
268/2025
Registration Date
11-Nov-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Salem
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 09-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Seerangan
Adv. Senthilkumar M
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chinnathambi and 14 others
-
2.K Palanisamy
-
3.K Manickam
-
4.Suseela
-
5.Selvi
-
6.Rajagopal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Principal District Judge, Salem allowed the transfer petition and ordered that suit O.S.No.57/2022 (declaration and injunction suit) be transferred from the District Munsif Court, Omalur to the Subordinate Court, Omalur to be tried jointly with O.S.No.1/2022 (partition suit). The court found that both suits involve the same undivided ancestral joint family properties with interlinked issues and parties, and consolidating them would prevent conflicting judgments and avoid multiplicity of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Orders
Principal District Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 268/2025
The Principal District Judge, Salem allowed the transfer petition and ordered that suit O.S.No.57/2022 (declaration and injunction suit) be transferred from the District Munsif Court, Omalur to the Subordinate Court, Omalur to be tried jointly with O.S.No.1/2022 (partition suit). The court found that both suits involve the same undivided ancestral joint family properties with interlinked issues and parties, and consolidating them would prevent conflicting judgments and avoid multiplicity of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts