D.SANTHI vs K.PERUMAL — 577/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER,7,RULES,1,TO,6. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.

Trial Next hearing 06-Apr-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSA010055482022

e-Filing Number

13-10-2022

Filing Number

2301/2022

Filing Date

13-Oct-2022

Registration No

577/2022

Registration Date

13-Oct-2022

Court

Principal District Court, Salem

Judge

2-I Additional District Judge

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER,7,RULES,1,TO,6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.D.SANTHI

    Adv. ARUNKUMAR. R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.K.PERUMAL

  2. 2.P.BALAMURUGAN

  3. 3.T. SUMATHI

Case History

  1. 06-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Trial

    I Additional District Judge

  3. 06-Feb-2026

    Trial

    I Additional District Judge

  4. 07-Jan-2026

    Trial

    I Additional District Judge

  5. 24-Oct-2025

    Trial

    I Additional District Judge

  6. 29-Aug-2025

    Additional Issues

    I Additional District Judge

  7. 31-Jul-2025

    Additional Issues

    I Additional District Judge

  8. 01-Jul-2025

    Additional Written Statement

    I Additional District Judge

  9. 18-Jun-2025

    Additional Written Statement

    I Additional District Judge

  10. 21-Apr-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The First Additional District Court of Salem allowed the interlocutory petition (I.A. 3/2024) in appeal case 577/2022 filed by petitioner D. Shanthi. The court permitted the petitioner/appellant to file a reply statement under CPC Order 8 Rule 9 and Section 151, and allowed the first and second respondents to file additional counter-affidavits. The court found the petitioner's grounds sufficiently meritorious and directed both parties to be given opportunity for proper rejoinders before the trial court decides the substantive issues regarding family entitlements and adoptive succession rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 21-Apr-2025

    Additional Written Statement

    I Additional District Judge

  12. 27-Mar-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    I Additional District Judge

  13. 06-Feb-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    I Additional District Judge

  14. 13-Jan-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    I Additional District Judge

  15. 26-Nov-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    I Additional District Judge

  16. 20-Sep-2024

    Trial

    I Additional District Judge

  17. 21-Jun-2024

    Trial

    I Additional District Judge

  18. 04-Apr-2024

    Issues

    I Additional District Judge

  19. 01-Feb-2024

    Issues

    I Additional District Judge

  20. 23-Nov-2023

    Issues

    I Additional District Judge

  21. 18-Sep-2023

    Issues

    I Additional District Judge

  22. 28-Jul-2023

    Issues

    I Additional District Judge

  23. 12-Jun-2023

    Issues

    I Additional District Judge

  24. 20-Mar-2023

    Issues

    I Additional District Judge

  25. 23-Feb-2023

    Written Statement

    I Additional District Judge

  26. 23-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    I Additional District Judge

  27. 22-Nov-2022

    Written Statement

    I Additional District Judge

  28. 14-Oct-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 13-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 577/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The First Additional District Court of Salem allowed the interlocutory petition (I.A. 3/2024) in appeal case 577/2022 filed by petitioner D. Shanthi. The court permitted the petitioner/appellant to file a reply statement under CPC Order 8 Rule 9 and Section 151, and allowed the first and second respondents to file additional counter-affidavits. The court found the petitioner's grounds sufficiently meritorious and directed both parties to be given opportunity for proper rejoinders before the trial court decides the substantive issues regarding family entitlements and adoptive succession rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case