Thangamani and another vs The Special District Revenue Officer (LA) — 209/2022
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 64(2)(b). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNSA010050212022
Filing Number
2114/2022
Filing Date
12-Sep-2022
Registration No
209/2022
Registration Date
12-Sep-2022
Court
Principal District Court, Salem
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Thangamani and another
Adv. GANAPATHI.R
-
2.Devarajan
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Special District Revenue Officer (LA)
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Apr-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Judge
-
06-Jan-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Judge
-
01-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Principal District Judge
-
29-Oct-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
22-Sep-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
19-Sep-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
19-Aug-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
12-Aug-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
25-Jul-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
02-Jul-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
PETITION DISMISSED RTROP No. 209/2022 | Salem District Court | 02.07.2025 The Principal District Judge dismissed the petitioner's revision petition challenging land acquisition for highway expansion on the Omalur-Paramathi-Vellore road. The court rejected claims that the petitioner's livelihood was affected and held that compensation was properly determined using government guidelines based on 2017-2020 price data. The land acquisition proceedings, survey notification, and valuation were found to be in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jul-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
01-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
16-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
29-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
09-Apr-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
03-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
18-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
26-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
04-Feb-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
04-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
10-Jan-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
10-Jan-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
07-Dec-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
16-Nov-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
28-Oct-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
28-Oct-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
30-Sep-2024
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
04-Sep-2024
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
28-Aug-2024
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
09-Aug-2024
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
15-Jul-2024
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
19-Jun-2024
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
25-Apr-2024
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
04-Mar-2024
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
16-Feb-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
29-Jan-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
24-Jan-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
21-Dec-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
21-Nov-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
01-Nov-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
05-Oct-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
18-Sep-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
28-Aug-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
31-Jul-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
11-Jul-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
20-Jun-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
24-Apr-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
21-Mar-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
08-Feb-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
16-Dec-2022
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
16-Nov-2022
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
12-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Sep-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 209/2022
PETITION DISMISSED RTROP No. 209/2022 | Salem District Court | 02.07.2025 The Principal District Judge dismissed the petitioner's revision petition challenging land acquisition for highway expansion on the Omalur-Paramathi-Vellore road. The court rejected claims that the petitioner's livelihood was affected and held that compensation was properly determined using government guidelines based on 2017-2020 price data. The land acquisition proceedings, survey notification, and valuation were found to be in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts