P.Ravi vs The Land Acquisition Officer District REvenue Officer, Salem and another — 183/2021
Case under National Highways Act Section 34/2002. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNSA010043162021
Filing Number
1336/2021
Filing Date
17-Aug-2021
Registration No
183/2021
Registration Date
17-Aug-2021
Court
Principal District Court, Salem
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P.Ravi
Adv. SELVAKUMAR. K.
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Land Acquisition Officer District REvenue Officer, Salem and another
-
2.The Divisional Engineer Highway
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Apr-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
20-Nov-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
07-Nov-2025
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
23-Oct-2025
Additional Counter
Principal District Judge
-
25-Sep-2025
Additional Counter
Principal District Judge
-
29-Aug-2025
Additional Counter
Principal District Judge
-
29-Jul-2025
Additional Counter
Principal District Judge
-
01-Jul-2025
Additional Counter
Principal District Judge
-
17-Jun-2025
Additional Counter
Principal District Judge
-
17-Apr-2025
Additional Counter
Principal District Judge
-
19-Mar-2025
Additional Counter
Principal District Judge
-
03-Mar-2025
Additional Counter
Principal District Judge
-
18-Feb-2025
Additional Counter
Principal District Judge
-
30-Jan-2025
Additional Counter
Principal District Judge
-
08-Jan-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Judge
-
13-Dec-2024
IA Pending
Principal District Judge
-
03-Dec-2024
IA Pending
Principal District Judge
-
14-Nov-2024
IA Pending
Principal District Judge
-
12-Nov-2024
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
21-Oct-2024
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
03-Oct-2024
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
18-Sep-2024
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
12-Sep-2024
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
14-Aug-2024
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
18-Jul-2024
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
01-Jul-2024
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
15-Jun-2024
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
29-Apr-2024
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
25-Apr-2024
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
23-Apr-2024
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
12-Apr-2024
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
26-Mar-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Summary In this land acquisition case (RTROP No.183/2021) before the Principal District Judge, Salem, the court on 26.03.2024 affirmed the witness (RW-1) testimony regarding property details and valuation under the Oaths Act. The court examined extensive evidence on land acquisition proceedings, subdivision records, sales data from 2014-2017, and compensation valuation, ultimately rejecting the petitioner's claim for Rs. 50,000 per square meter compensation for commercial land areas and dismissing the petition without remand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2024
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
11-Mar-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
23-Feb-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
09-Feb-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
23-Jan-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
03-Jan-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
14-Dec-2023
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
08-Dec-2023
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
02-Dec-2023
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
10-Nov-2023
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
18-Oct-2023
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
29-Sep-2023
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
13-Sep-2023
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
04-Sep-2023
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
22-Aug-2023
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
31-Jul-2023
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
19-Jul-2023
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
28-Jun-2023
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
07-Jun-2023
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
05-Jun-2023
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
10-Apr-2023
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
15-Mar-2023
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
14-Feb-2023
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
25-Jan-2023
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
04-Jan-2023
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
08-Dec-2022
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
22-Nov-2022
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
09-Nov-2022
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
18-Oct-2022
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
13-Sep-2022
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
25-Aug-2022
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
02-Aug-2022
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
07-Jul-2022
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
08-Jun-2022
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
08-Apr-2022
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
16-Mar-2022
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
28-Feb-2022
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
17-Feb-2022
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
17-Feb-2022
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
10-Feb-2022
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
21-Jan-2022
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
20-Dec-2021
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
06-Dec-2021
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
19-Nov-2021
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
21-Oct-2021
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
13-Sep-2021
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
17-Aug-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Aug-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 183/2021
Summary In this land acquisition case (RTROP No.183/2021) before the Principal District Judge, Salem, the court on 26.03.2024 affirmed the witness (RW-1) testimony regarding property details and valuation under the Oaths Act. The court examined extensive evidence on land acquisition proceedings, subdivision records, sales data from 2014-2017, and compensation valuation, ultimately rejecting the petitioner's claim for Rs. 50,000 per square meter compensation for commercial land areas and dismissing the petition without remand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts