Papathiammal vs The Land Acquisition Officer District REvenue Officer, Salem and another — 180/2021

Case under National Highways Act Section 34/2002. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNSA010043132021

Filing Number

1333/2021

Filing Date

17-Aug-2021

Registration No

180/2021

Registration Date

17-Aug-2021

Court

Principal District Court, Salem

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Last updated 08-May-2026

Acts & Sections

National Highways Act Section 34/2002

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Papathiammal

    Adv. SELVAKUMAR. K.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Land Acquisition Officer District REvenue Officer, Salem and another

  2. 2.The Divisional Engineer Highways,

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  8. 15-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  9. 09-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  10. 05-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  11. 20-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  12. 18-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  13. 07-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  14. 23-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  15. 25-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  16. 29-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  17. 29-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  18. 01-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  19. 17-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  20. 17-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  21. 19-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  22. 03-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  23. 18-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  24. 30-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  25. 08-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  26. 13-Dec-2024

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  27. 03-Dec-2024

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  28. 18-Nov-2024

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  29. 08-Nov-2024

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  30. 18-Oct-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  31. 03-Oct-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  32. 12-Sep-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  33. 14-Aug-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  34. 18-Jul-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  35. 01-Jul-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  36. 15-Jun-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  37. 25-Apr-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  38. 23-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  39. 12-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  40. 26-Mar-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary In this land acquisition case (RTROP.No.180/2021) decided by the Principal District Judge, Salem on 26.03.2024, the court affirmed the witness (RW-1) and examined detailed evidence regarding property valuation and acquisition proceedings. The court found that while the land acquisition notification was properly issued under the Tamil Nadu Tenements Act, 2001, the compensation valuation of ₹4,690 per square meter for commercial property was unreasonably low; the court rejected the petitioner's claim for ₹50,000 per square meter compensation, finding insufficient basis for such enhancement. The petition was dismissed without further relief, and no re-examination was ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  41. 26-Mar-2024

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  42. 11-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  43. 23-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  44. 09-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  45. 23-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  46. 03-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  47. 14-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  48. 08-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  49. 02-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  50. 10-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  51. 18-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  52. 29-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  53. 13-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  54. 04-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  55. 22-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  56. 31-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  57. 19-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  58. 28-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  59. 07-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  60. 05-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  61. 10-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  62. 15-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  63. 14-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  64. 25-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  65. 04-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  66. 08-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  67. 22-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  68. 09-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  69. 18-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  70. 13-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  71. 25-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  72. 02-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  73. 07-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  74. 08-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  75. 08-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  76. 16-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  77. 28-Feb-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  78. 17-Feb-2022

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  79. 17-Feb-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  80. 10-Feb-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  81. 21-Jan-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  82. 20-Dec-2021

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  83. 06-Dec-2021

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  84. 19-Nov-2021

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  85. 21-Oct-2021

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  86. 13-Sep-2021

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  87. 17-Aug-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  88. 17-Aug-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 180/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In this land acquisition case (RTROP.No.180/2021) decided by the Principal District Judge, Salem on 26.03.2024, the court affirmed the witness (RW-1) and examined detailed evidence regarding property valuation and acquisition proceedings. The court found that while the land acquisition notification was properly issued under the Tamil Nadu Tenements Act, 2001, the compensation valuation of ₹4,690 per square meter for commercial property was unreasonably low; the court rejected the petitioner's claim for ₹50,000 per square meter compensation, finding insufficient basis for such enhancement. The petition was dismissed without further relief, and no re-examination was ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case