Papathiammal vs The Land Acquisition Officer District REvenue Officer, Salem and another — 180/2021
Case under Nationalhighwaysact Section 34/2002. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNSA010043132021
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1333/2021
Filing Date
17-08-2021
Registration No
180/2021
Registration Date
17-08-2021
Court
Principal District Court, Salem
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Papathiammal
Adv. SELVAKUMAR. K.
Respondent(s)
The Land Acquisition Officer District REvenue Officer, Salem and another
The Divisional Engineer Highways,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 13-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary In this land acquisition case (RTROP.No.180/2021) decided by the Principal District Judge, Salem on 26.03.2024, the court affirmed the witness (RW-1) and examined detailed evidence regarding property valuation and acquisition proceedings. The court found that while the land acquisition notification was properly issued under the Tamil Nadu Tenements Act, 2001, the compensation valuation of ₹4,690 per square meter for commercial property was unreasonably low; the court rejected the petitioner's claim for ₹50,000 per square meter compensation, finding insufficient basis for such enhancement. The petition was dismissed without further relief, and no re-examination was ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In this land acquisition case (RTROP.No.180/2021) decided by the Principal District Judge, Salem on 26.03.2024, the court affirmed the witness (RW-1) and examined detailed evidence regarding property valuation and acquisition proceedings. The court found that while the land acquisition notification was properly issued under the Tamil Nadu Tenements Act, 2001, the compensation valuation of ₹4,690 per square meter for commercial property was unreasonably low; the court rejected the petitioner's claim for ₹50,000 per square meter compensation, finding insufficient basis for such enhancement. The petition was dismissed without further relief, and no re-examination was ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts