Parvathi vs The Land Acquisition Officer and another — 179/2021

Case under National Highways Act Section 34/2002. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNSA010043122021

Filing Number

1332/2021

Filing Date

17-Aug-2021

Registration No

179/2021

Registration Date

17-Aug-2021

Court

Principal District Court, Salem

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Last updated 08-May-2026

Acts & Sections

National Highways Act Section 34/2002

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Parvathi

    Adv. SELVAKUMAR. K.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Land Acquisition Officer and another

  2. 2.The Divisional Engineer Highway,

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  8. 15-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  9. 09-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  10. 05-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  11. 20-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  12. 18-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  13. 07-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  14. 23-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  15. 25-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  16. 29-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  17. 29-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  18. 01-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  19. 17-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  20. 17-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  21. 19-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  22. 03-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  23. 18-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  24. 30-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  25. 08-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  26. 13-Dec-2024

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  27. 03-Dec-2024

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  28. 18-Nov-2024

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  29. 08-Nov-2024

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  30. 18-Oct-2024

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  31. 03-Oct-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  32. 12-Sep-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  33. 14-Aug-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  34. 18-Jul-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  35. 01-Jul-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  36. 15-Jun-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  37. 25-Apr-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  38. 23-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  39. 12-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  40. 26-Mar-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary Case: RTROP.No.179/2021, Principal District Judge, Salem Outcome: The court affirmed the witness (RW-1) on 26.03.2024 and rejected the petitioner's claims regarding land acquisition compensation. The court found that the government's valuation of ₹4,690 per square meter for commercial land was appropriate and dismissed the petitioner's demand for ₹50,000 per square meter compensation. No re-hearing was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  41. 26-Mar-2024

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  42. 11-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  43. 23-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  44. 09-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  45. 23-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  46. 03-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  47. 14-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  48. 08-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  49. 02-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  50. 10-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  51. 18-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  52. 29-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  53. 13-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  54. 04-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  55. 22-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  56. 31-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  57. 19-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  58. 28-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  59. 07-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  60. 05-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  61. 10-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  62. 15-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  63. 14-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  64. 25-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  65. 04-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  66. 08-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  67. 22-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  68. 09-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  69. 18-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  70. 13-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  71. 25-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  72. 02-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  73. 07-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  74. 08-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  75. 08-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  76. 16-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  77. 28-Feb-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  78. 17-Feb-2022

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  79. 17-Feb-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  80. 10-Feb-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  81. 21-Jan-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  82. 20-Dec-2021

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  83. 06-Dec-2021

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  84. 19-Nov-2021

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  85. 21-Oct-2021

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  86. 13-Sep-2021

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  87. 17-Aug-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  88. 17-Aug-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 179/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: RTROP.No.179/2021, Principal District Judge, Salem Outcome: The court affirmed the witness (RW-1) on 26.03.2024 and rejected the petitioner's claims regarding land acquisition compensation. The court found that the government's valuation of ₹4,690 per square meter for commercial land was appropriate and dismissed the petitioner's demand for ₹50,000 per square meter compensation. No re-hearing was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case