P.Arumugam and 2 others vs The Land Acquisition Officer District REvenue Officer, Salem and another — 177/2021

Case under National Highways Act Section 34/2002. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNSA010043102021

Filing Number

1330/2021

Filing Date

17-Aug-2021

Registration No

177/2021

Registration Date

17-Aug-2021

Court

Principal District Court, Salem

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Last updated 08-May-2026

Acts & Sections

National Highways Act Section 34/2002

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.Arumugam and 2 others

    Adv. SELVAKUMAR. K.

  2. 2.P. Manivel

  3. 3.P. Ravikumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Land Acquisition Officer District REvenue Officer, Salem and another

  2. 2.The Divisional Engineer Highways, Construction and Maintenance

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Additional Counter

    Principal District Judge

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    Additional Counter

    Principal District Judge

  8. 15-Dec-2025

    Additional Counter

    Principal District Judge

  9. 09-Dec-2025

    Additional Counter

    Principal District Judge

  10. 05-Dec-2025

    Additional Counter

    Principal District Judge

  11. 20-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  12. 18-Nov-2025

    Amendment

    Principal District Judge

  13. 07-Nov-2025

    Amendment

    Principal District Judge

  14. 23-Oct-2025

    Amendment

    Principal District Judge

  15. 25-Sep-2025

    Amendment

    Principal District Judge

  16. 29-Aug-2025

    Amendment

    Principal District Judge

  17. 29-Jul-2025

    Amendment

    Principal District Judge

  18. 01-Jul-2025

    Amendment

    Principal District Judge

  19. 17-Jun-2025

    Amendment

    Principal District Judge

  20. 17-Apr-2025

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  21. 19-Mar-2025

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  22. 03-Mar-2025

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  23. 17-Feb-2025

    Steps

    Principal District Judge

  24. 03-Feb-2025

    Steps

    Principal District Judge

  25. 30-Jan-2025

    Amendment

    Principal District Judge

  26. 08-Jan-2025

    Amendment

    Principal District Judge

  27. 13-Dec-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  28. 03-Dec-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  29. 14-Nov-2024

    Steps

    Principal District Judge

  30. 12-Nov-2024

    Steps

    Principal District Judge

  31. 21-Oct-2024

    Steps

    Principal District Judge

  32. 03-Oct-2024

    Steps

    Principal District Judge

  33. 12-Sep-2024

    Steps

    Principal District Judge

  34. 14-Aug-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  35. 18-Jul-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  36. 01-Jul-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  37. 15-Jun-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  38. 25-Apr-2024

    IA Pending

    Principal District Judge

  39. 23-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  40. 12-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  41. 26-Mar-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Court Order Summary Case: RTROP.No.177/2021, Principal District Judge, Salem Date: 26.03.2024 The court affirmed the witness (RW-1) oath and examined a land acquisition dispute. The court found that the compensation of ₹4,690 per square meter for acquired commercial land was inadequate. The judge held that commercial properties surrounded by business establishments should have received significantly higher compensation of ₹50,000 per square meter, and directed that additional compensation be awarded to account for business losses incurred during the acquisition and construction delay period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  42. 26-Mar-2024

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  43. 11-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  44. 23-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  45. 09-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  46. 23-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  47. 03-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  48. 14-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  49. 08-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  50. 02-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  51. 10-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  52. 18-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  53. 29-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  54. 13-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  55. 04-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  56. 22-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  57. 31-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  58. 19-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  59. 28-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  60. 07-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  61. 05-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  62. 10-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  63. 15-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  64. 14-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  65. 25-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  66. 04-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  67. 08-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  68. 22-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  69. 09-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  70. 18-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  71. 13-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  72. 25-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  73. 02-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  74. 07-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  75. 08-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  76. 08-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  77. 16-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  78. 28-Feb-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  79. 17-Feb-2022

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  80. 17-Feb-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  81. 10-Feb-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  82. 21-Jan-2022

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  83. 20-Dec-2021

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  84. 06-Dec-2021

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  85. 19-Nov-2021

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  86. 21-Oct-2021

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  87. 13-Sep-2021

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge

  88. 17-Aug-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  89. 17-Aug-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 177/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: RTROP.No.177/2021, Principal District Judge, Salem Date: 26.03.2024 The court affirmed the witness (RW-1) oath and examined a land acquisition dispute. The court found that the compensation of ₹4,690 per square meter for acquired commercial land was inadequate. The judge held that commercial properties surrounded by business establishments should have received significantly higher compensation of ₹50,000 per square meter, and directed that additional compensation be awarded to account for business losses incurred during the acquisition and construction delay period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case