P.Arumugam and 2 others vs The Land Acquisition Officer District REvenue Officer, Salem and another — 177/2021
Case under Nationalhighwaysact Section 34/2002. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNSA010043102021
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1330/2021
Filing Date
17-08-2021
Registration No
177/2021
Registration Date
17-08-2021
Court
Principal District Court, Salem
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.Arumugam and 2 others
Adv. SELVAKUMAR. K.
P. Manivel
P. Ravikumar
Respondent(s)
The Land Acquisition Officer District REvenue Officer, Salem and another
The Divisional Engineer Highways, Construction and Maintenance
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Additional Counter
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 13-02-2026 | Additional Counter |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: RTROP.No.177/2021, Principal District Judge, Salem Date: 26.03.2024 The court affirmed the witness (RW-1) oath and examined a land acquisition dispute. The court found that the compensation of ₹4,690 per square meter for acquired commercial land was inadequate. The judge held that commercial properties surrounded by business establishments should have received significantly higher compensation of ₹50,000 per square meter, and directed that additional compensation be awarded to account for business losses incurred during the acquisition and construction delay period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: RTROP.No.177/2021, Principal District Judge, Salem Date: 26.03.2024 The court affirmed the witness (RW-1) oath and examined a land acquisition dispute. The court found that the compensation of ₹4,690 per square meter for acquired commercial land was inadequate. The judge held that commercial properties surrounded by business establishments should have received significantly higher compensation of ₹50,000 per square meter, and directed that additional compensation be awarded to account for business losses incurred during the acquisition and construction delay period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts