N Santhana Krishnan vs NIL — 120/2024

Case under Indiansuccessionact Section 372. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNSA010042082024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

19-08-2024

Filing Number

1815/2024

Filing Date

21-08-2024

Registration No

120/2024

Registration Date

03-09-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Salem

Judge

2-I Additional District Judge

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

IndianSuccessionAct Section 372

Petitioner(s)

N Santhana Krishnan

Adv. VELKUMAR ARUNACHALAM

R JAYASANKARI

Adv. VELKUMAR ARUNACHALAM

R Sankararaman

Adv. VELKUMAR ARUNACHALAM

S Sankar Ram

Adv. VELKUMAR ARUNACHALAM

S Sudha

Adv. VELKUMAR ARUNACHALAM

S Lalitha

Adv. VELKUMAR ARUNACHALAM

R Uma Gowri

Adv. VELKUMAR ARUNACHALAM

Respondent(s)

NIL

Hearing History

Judge: 2-I Additional District Judge

10-03-2026

Disposed

02-03-2026

Orders

04-02-2026

Orders

09-01-2026

For further Proceedings

16-12-2025

For further Proceedings

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The I Additional District Judge of Salem granted a Succession Certificate to N. Santhana Krishnan (first petitioner) in favor of the legal heirs of deceased P. Natarajan and N. Muthulakshmi, enabling him to receive 1,000 TVS Motor Company shares (including bonus shares) and all accumulated dividends. The court found that all seven petitioners were legitimate legal heirs with no conflicting claims, and authorized the first petitioner as representative to collect the assets on behalf of all heirs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The I Additional District Judge of Salem granted a Succession Certificate to N. Santhana Krishnan (first petitioner) in favor of the legal heirs of deceased P. Natarajan and N. Muthulakshmi, enabling him to receive 1,000 TVS Motor Company shares (including bonus shares) and all accumulated dividends. The court found that all seven petitioners were legitimate legal heirs with no conflicting claims, and authorized the first petitioner as representative to collect the assets on behalf of all heirs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Salem All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case