Thangaraj vs The Special District Revenue Officer (LAO) and another — 189/2023
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 64(2)(b). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNSA010041812023
Filing Number
1517/2023
Filing Date
23-Aug-2023
Registration No
189/2023
Registration Date
23-Aug-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Salem
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Thangaraj
Adv. AYYANDURAI.G
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Special District Revenue Officer (LAO) and another
-
2.The Divisional Engineer (Highways)
Case History
-
17-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
20-Apr-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
04-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case 189/2023 Summary Petitioner Thangaraj's testimony in this land acquisition dispute reveals cross-examination regarding 15 cents of agricultural land in Pappampatty village acquired for highway construction. The court found that compensation assessed by the Land Acquisition Officer was based on market values from three years prior to the 2020 acquisition notification, and rejected Thangaraj's post-acquisition valuations as irrelevant. Petition dismissed on November 11, 2025; the land officer's compensation determination was upheld as valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
05-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
14-Aug-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
18-Jul-2025
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
18-Jun-2025
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
23-Apr-2025
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
21-Mar-2025
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
26-Feb-2025
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
30-Jan-2025
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
08-Jan-2025
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
09-Dec-2024
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
08-Nov-2024
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
18-Oct-2024
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
19-Sep-2024
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
23-Aug-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
05-Aug-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
04-Jul-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
04-Jun-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
06-Apr-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
20-Mar-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
01-Mar-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
08-Feb-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
08-Jan-2024
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
28-Nov-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
07-Nov-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
27-Sep-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
23-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 189/2023
Case 189/2023 Summary Petitioner Thangaraj's testimony in this land acquisition dispute reveals cross-examination regarding 15 cents of agricultural land in Pappampatty village acquired for highway construction. The court found that compensation assessed by the Land Acquisition Officer was based on market values from three years prior to the 2020 acquisition notification, and rejected Thangaraj's post-acquisition valuations as irrelevant. Petition dismissed on November 11, 2025; the land officer's compensation determination was upheld as valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts