Palanisamy vs Rangasamy @ Selvam Advocate - SANTHI. S. A. — 359/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR7R1to6. Disposed: Contested--Decreed with cost on 30th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA010024352023
Filing Number
998/2023
Filing Date
01-Jun-2023
Registration No
359/2023
Registration Date
01-Jun-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Salem
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed with cost
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Palanisamy
Adv. THANGADURAI K
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rangasamy @ Selvam Advocate - SANTHI. S. A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Lok Adalat
Principal District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
04-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
This document appears to be a cross-examination transcript of a witness (DW1 - Rangasamy) in O.S. No. 359/2023 from the Salem District Court, dated 10.02.2026. The witness testifies about a promissory note dated 05.03.2021, denies the signatures and fingerprints on it are his, and provides inconsistent statements regarding a loan transaction of ₹18,00,000. The court finds the witness's testimony lacks credibility due to multiple contradictions between his examination-in-chief, written reply, and cross-examination statements, ultimately questioning the authenticity of the promissory note and the validity of the debt claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
20-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
05-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
17-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
10-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
28-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
04-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
14-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
25-Jun-2025
Additional Issues
Principal District Judge
-
17-Jun-2025
Additional Issues
Principal District Judge
-
10-Jun-2025
Additional Issues
Principal District Judge
-
04-Jun-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Judge
-
17-Apr-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Judge
-
05-Apr-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Judge
-
25-Mar-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Judge
-
17-Mar-2025
IA Pending
Principal District Judge
-
07-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
20-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
06-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
27-Jan-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
27-Jan-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
08-Jan-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
08-Jan-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
10-Dec-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
25-Nov-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
25-Nov-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
18-Nov-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
18-Nov-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
11-Nov-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
28-Oct-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
28-Oct-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
19-Oct-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
01-Oct-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
23-Sep-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
16-Sep-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
10-Sep-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
10-Sep-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
24-Aug-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
02-Aug-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
16-Jul-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
24-Jun-2024
Await Reports
Principal District Judge
-
06-Jun-2024
Await Reports
Principal District Judge
-
12-Apr-2024
Await Reports
Principal District Judge
-
22-Mar-2024
Await Reports
Principal District Judge
-
04-Mar-2024
Await Reports
Principal District Judge
-
21-Feb-2024
Await Reports
Principal District Judge
-
06-Feb-2024
Await Reports
Principal District Judge
-
11-Jan-2024
Await Reports
Principal District Judge
-
12-Dec-2023
Mediation
Principal District Judge
-
08-Nov-2023
Appearance
Principal District Judge
-
17-Oct-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
29-Sep-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
29-Aug-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
10-Aug-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
18-Jul-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
01-Jul-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
01-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jun-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 359/2023
This document appears to be a cross-examination transcript of a witness (DW1 - Rangasamy) in O.S. No. 359/2023 from the Salem District Court, dated 10.02.2026. The witness testifies about a promissory note dated 05.03.2021, denies the signatures and fingerprints on it are his, and provides inconsistent statements regarding a loan transaction of ₹18,00,000. The court finds the witness's testimony lacks credibility due to multiple contradictions between his examination-in-chief, written reply, and cross-examination statements, ultimately questioning the authenticity of the promissory note and the validity of the debt claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts