G. Murugan vs M.Senthilkumar — 127/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR21R11(2). Status: Publication. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Publication Next hearing 04-Jun-2026

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNSA010021802022

Filing Number

837/2022

Filing Date

12-Apr-2022

Registration No

127/2022

Registration Date

10-Jun-2022

Court

Principal District Court, Salem

Judge

8-III Additional District Judge

Last updated 09-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section OR21R11(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.G. Murugan

    Adv. Pala.NAGARAJAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M.Senthilkumar

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Publication

    III Additional District Judge

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    III Additional District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    III Additional District Judge

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    III Additional District Judge

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    III Additional District Judge

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    III Additional District Judge

  8. 06-Jan-2026

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    III Additional District Judge

  9. 16-Dec-2025

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    III Additional District Judge

  10. 04-Dec-2025

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    III Additional District Judge

  11. 25-Nov-2025

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    III Additional District Judge

  12. 18-Nov-2025

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    III Additional District Judge

  13. 11-Nov-2025

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    III Additional District Judge

  14. 06-Nov-2025

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    III Additional District Judge

  15. 25-Oct-2025

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    III Additional District Judge

  16. 10-Oct-2025

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    III Additional District Judge

  17. 25-Sep-2025

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    III Additional District Judge

  18. 16-Sep-2025

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    III Additional District Judge

  19. 10-Sep-2025

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    III Additional District Judge

  20. 02-Sep-2025

    Sale Paper Submitted/ Returned

    III Additional District Judge

  21. 21-Aug-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  22. 08-Aug-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  23. 23-Jul-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  24. 17-Jul-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  25. 09-Jul-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  26. 20-Jun-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  27. 24-Apr-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  28. 24-Mar-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  29. 20-Feb-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  30. 20-Feb-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    SUMMARY: The petition filed by N. Subash (third-party claimant) under Order 21 Rule 58 of CPC seeking to establish his right to properties purchased on 15.03.2022 has been dismissed. The court held that the sale transaction was hit by Sections 52 and 53 of the Transfer of Property Act, as the properties were purchased during the pendency of execution proceedings initiated by the decree holder (G. Murugan) in an earlier money recovery suit. The petitioner is bound by the decree passed in OS.No.229/2018 and cannot claim to be a bona fide purchaser. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  31. 20-Feb-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  32. 06-Feb-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  33. 28-Jan-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  34. 07-Jan-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  35. 12-Dec-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  36. 04-Oct-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  37. 13-Aug-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  38. 21-Jun-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  39. 22-Apr-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  40. 26-Feb-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  41. 20-Dec-2023

    Batta

    III Additional District Judge

  42. 20-Oct-2023

    Batta

    III Additional District Judge

  43. 08-Sep-2023

    Batta

    III Additional District Judge

  44. 04-Aug-2023

    Batta

    III Additional District Judge

  45. 21-Jul-2023

    Batta

    III Additional District Judge

  46. 20-Apr-2023

    Batta

    III Additional District Judge

  47. 20-Feb-2023

    Batta

    III Additional District Judge

  48. 06-Dec-2022

    Batta

    III Additional District Judge

  49. 19-Sep-2022

    Batta

    III Additional District Judge

  50. 11-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 12-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 127/2022

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The petition filed by N. Subash (third-party claimant) under Order 21 Rule 58 of CPC seeking to establish his right to properties purchased on 15.03.2022 has been dismissed. The court held that the sale transaction was hit by Sections 52 and 53 of the Transfer of Property Act, as the properties were purchased during the pendency of execution proceedings initiated by the decree holder (G. Murugan) in an earlier money recovery suit. The petitioner is bound by the decree passed in OS.No.229/2018 and cannot claim to be a bona fide purchaser. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case