Chitra Devi vs Pappathi Advocate - DEEPAK KUMAR.C — 71/2021
Case under Indiansuccessionact Section 276. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNSA010018762021
Filing Number
607/2021
Filing Date
31-03-2021
Registration No
71/2021
Registration Date
21-04-2021
Court
Principal District Court, Salem
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chitra Devi
Adv. RANGANATHAN K.V.
Respondent(s)
Pappathi Advocate - DEEPAK KUMAR.C
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Orders
Hearing on Sentence
Hearing on Sentence
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Orders |
| 04-03-2026 | Hearing on Sentence |
| 17-02-2026 | Hearing on Sentence |
| 03-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary The Principal District Judge of Salem affirmed witness PW-3's testimony on 10.08.2023 in Probate Case O.P.No.71/2021, finding the will document authentic with the petitioner's identity verified against original records. However, the court found critical deficiencies: the will lacked proper date notation, was executed before the deceased husband's death, and contained inconsistencies regarding witness attestation, rendering it legally defective. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal District Judge of Salem affirmed witness PW-3's testimony on 10.08.2023 in Probate Case O.P.No.71/2021, finding the will document authentic with the petitioner's identity verified against original records. However, the court found critical deficiencies: the will lacked proper date notation, was executed before the deceased husband's death, and contained inconsistencies regarding witness attestation, rendering it legally defective. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts