Chandrasekar vs Sub Inspector of Police Shevapet PS Advocate - THAMBI DURAI.P — 603/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSA010012812026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

845/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

603/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Salem

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 09-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

20

Police Station

Shevapet

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(a), 4(1-A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chandrasekar

    Adv. Vijayakumar Arumugam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sub Inspector of Police Shevapet PS (Police Station) Advocate - THAMBI DURAI.P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Salem granted bail to 65-year-old Chandrasekar, accused of possessing 130 bottles of Black Pearl Brandy with poisonous substances under TNP Act sections 4(1)(a) and 4(1-A), considering his 15-day incarceration and clean criminal record. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting, non-tampering with evidence/witnesses, and prohibition against absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 603/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Salem granted bail to 65-year-old Chandrasekar, accused of possessing 130 bottles of Black Pearl Brandy with poisonous substances under TNP Act sections 4(1)(a) and 4(1-A), considering his 15-day incarceration and clean criminal record. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting, non-tampering with evidence/witnesses, and prohibition against absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case