Dinesh vs Inspector of Police Fairlands Police Station, Salem City Advocate - THAMBI DURAI.P — 601/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSA010012762026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

840/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

601/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Salem

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 09-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

43

Police Station

Fairlands

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C), 4(1)(a), 4(1-A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dinesh

    Adv. KATHERVELLU T

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police Fairlands Police Station, Salem City Advocate - THAMBI DURAI.P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Salem Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Dinesh, accused of possessing 92 bottles of liquor containing poisonous substances under TNP Act sections, considering his 15-day incarceration and lack of prior cases, despite prosecution objections citing an alleged POCSO case involvement. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting, availability for interrogation, and prohibitions on tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 601/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Salem Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Dinesh, accused of possessing 92 bottles of liquor containing poisonous substances under TNP Act sections, considering his 15-day incarceration and lack of prior cases, despite prosecution objections citing an alleged POCSO case involvement. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting, availability for interrogation, and prohibitions on tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case