Karuppan vs Inspector of Police Karipatty PS Advocate - THAMBI DURAI.P — 614/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSA010012752026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

839/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

614/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Salem

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 09-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

29

Police Station

Karipatti

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Arms Act, 1959 Section 25(1)(a)
Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(a), 4(1-A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Karuppan

    Adv. K Chinnamooper

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police Karipatty PS (Police Station) Advocate - THAMBI DURAI.P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Salem granted bail to Karuppan, who was arrested for possessing illegal firearms and country-made liquor containing poisonous substances under the Arms Act and Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act. The court allowed the bail petition considering the petitioner's 39-day incarceration, imposing stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting, non-tampering with evidence, and availability for interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 614/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Salem granted bail to Karuppan, who was arrested for possessing illegal firearms and country-made liquor containing poisonous substances under the Arms Act and Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act. The court allowed the bail petition considering the petitioner's 39-day incarceration, imposing stringent conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police reporting, non-tampering with evidence, and availability for interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case