Lingaraj vs Inspector Of Police, Tharamangalam PS Advocate - THAMBI DURAI.P — 617/2026

Case under Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Acts 2003 Section 7,20(2). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSA010012732026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

837/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

617/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Salem

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 09-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

83

Police Station

Tharamangalam P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Acts 2003 Section 7,20(2)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 123,62,275
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Lingaraj

    Adv. S SHABEER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector Of Police, Tharamangalam PS (Police Station) Advocate - THAMBI DURAI.P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Salem dismissed the bail petition of Lingaraj, accused of possessing 1089 kg of banned tobacco products worth Rs. 5,67,800 under COTPA Act and BNS sections. The court found no change in circumstances since the previous bail dismissal on 23.02.2026, and rejected release considering the large quantity involved, the absconding godown owner, and the petitioner's 16 prior similar cases still under investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 617/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Salem dismissed the bail petition of Lingaraj, accused of possessing 1089 kg of banned tobacco products worth Rs. 5,67,800 under COTPA Act and BNS sections. The court found no change in circumstances since the previous bail dismissal on 23.02.2026, and rejected release considering the large quantity involved, the absconding godown owner, and the petitioner's 16 prior similar cases still under investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case