MUSTAFA vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE SALEM TOWN PS Advocate - THAMBI DURAI.P — 609/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSA010012692026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

834/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

609/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Salem

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 09-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1244

Police Station

Salem Town

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Indian Penal Code Section 341, 392, 397, 506(2), 294(b)

Petitioner(s)

1.MUSTAFA

Adv. Ganesan K

Respondent(s)

1.INSPECTOR OF POLICE SALEM TOWN PS (Police Station) Advocate - THAMBI DURAI.P

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
12-Mar-2026

Copy of JudgmentView PDF

The Principal Sessions Judge, Salem granted bail to Mustafa, accused of offences under IPC sections 294(b), 341, 392, 397, and 506(ii), considering his 50-day incarceration and non-willful court absence due to prior Goondas Act detention. The bail was approved on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily court appearances for 30 days, and prohibitions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
12-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal District Judge
10-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
07-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 609/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Salem granted bail to Mustafa, accused of offences under IPC sections 294(b), 341, 392, 397, and 506(ii), considering his 50-day incarceration and non-willful court absence due to prior Goondas Act detention. The bail was approved on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily court appearances for 30 days, and prohibitions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.