KARTHI AND ANOTHER vs The state rep By Inspector of Police Kitchipalaym Police station Advocate - THAMBI DURAI.P — 612/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSA010012652026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

830/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

612/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Salem

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

33

Police Station

Kitchipalayam

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 324(4), 351(3) al 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 109(1), 324(4) BNS

Petitioner(s)

KARTHI AND ANOTHER

Adv. Kuzhanthaivelu C

Vignesh ALIAS Vigneshwaran

Adv. Kuzhanthaivelu C

Respondent(s)

The state rep By Inspector of Police Kitchipalaym Police station Advocate - THAMBI DURAI.P

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

10-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The Principal Sessions Judge, Salem granted bail to two accused (Karthi and Vignesh) in a criminal case involving charges of assault and attempted murder at a temple, considering that their co-accused had already been granted bail and they had spent 29 days in judicial custody. The bail was granted on stringent conditions including executing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, daily police reporting, non-tampering with evidence/witnesses, and prohibition against absconding, with provisions for fresh FIR registration for breach of conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Salem granted bail to two accused (Karthi and Vignesh) in a criminal case involving charges of assault and attempted murder at a temple, considering that their co-accused had already been granted bail and they had spent 29 days in judicial custody. The bail was granted on stringent conditions including executing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, daily police reporting, non-tampering with evidence/witnesses, and prohibition against absconding, with provisions for fresh FIR registration for breach of conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Salem All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case