Vithiyaraj and another vs Sub Inspector of Police Tholasampatti PS Advocate - THAMBI DURAI.P — 618/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSA010012622026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

827/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

618/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Salem

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

27

Police Station

Tholasampatti P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 118(1), 351(3)

Petitioner(s)

Vithiyaraj and another

Adv. Amresh M

Govindaraj

Adv. Amresh M

Respondent(s)

Sub Inspector of Police Tholasampatti PS (Police Station) Advocate - THAMBI DURAI.P

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

10-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The Principal Sessions Judge, Salem granted anticipatory bail to two accused (father and son) charged with assault and criminal intimidation arising from a money dispute with their brother. The court allowed the petition considering the minor nature of injuries sustained, the victim's hospital discharge, and imposed strict conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond each, daily court appearances, and restrictions on tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Salem granted anticipatory bail to two accused (father and son) charged with assault and criminal intimidation arising from a money dispute with their brother. The court allowed the petition considering the minor nature of injuries sustained, the victim's hospital discharge, and imposed strict conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond each, daily court appearances, and restrictions on tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Salem All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case