Vithiyaraj and another vs Sub Inspector of Police Tholasampatti PS Advocate - THAMBI DURAI.P — 618/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSA010012622026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

827/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

618/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Salem

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 09-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

27

Police Station

Tholasampatti P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 118(1), 351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vithiyaraj and another

    Adv. Amresh M

  2. 2.Govindaraj

    Adv. Amresh M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sub Inspector of Police Tholasampatti PS (Police Station) Advocate - THAMBI DURAI.P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Salem granted anticipatory bail to two accused (father and son) charged with assault and criminal intimidation arising from a money dispute with their brother. The court allowed the petition considering the minor nature of injuries sustained, the victim's hospital discharge, and imposed strict conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond each, daily court appearances, and restrictions on tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 618/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Salem granted anticipatory bail to two accused (father and son) charged with assault and criminal intimidation arising from a money dispute with their brother. The court allowed the petition considering the minor nature of injuries sustained, the victim's hospital discharge, and imposed strict conditions including a Rs.10,000 bond each, daily court appearances, and restrictions on tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case