Ayyanar S vs The Sub Inspector of Police Kondalampatti PS Advocate - THAMBI DURAI.P — 606/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSA010012362026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

818/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

606/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Salem

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 09-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(c), 4(1)(a), 4(1-A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ayyanar S

    Adv. CHANDRAN M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Sub Inspector of Police Kondalampatti PS (Police Station) Advocate - THAMBI DURAI.P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Salem dismissed the bail petition of S. Ayyanar, who was accused of illegally possessing 150 bottles of brandy containing poisonous substances under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act. The court rejected the accused's arguments of false implication and clean record, finding that the serious nature of the offense and the large quantity of illicit liquor seized warranted continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 606/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Salem dismissed the bail petition of S. Ayyanar, who was accused of illegally possessing 150 bottles of brandy containing poisonous substances under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act. The court rejected the accused's arguments of false implication and clean record, finding that the serious nature of the offense and the large quantity of illicit liquor seized warranted continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case