M Balamurugan vs Inspector of Police, Salem City Cyber Crime PS Advocate - THAMBI DURAI.P — 576/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSA010012092026

e-Filing Number

03-03-2026

Filing Number

802/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

576/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Salem

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Information Technology Act 2000 Section 66(D)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316, 318(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M Balamurugan

    Adv. CINTHIYA K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Salem City Cyber Crime PS (Police Station) Advocate - THAMBI DURAI.P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Salem dismissed M. Balamurugan's bail petition (filed under Section 483 BNSS) without considering the merits, solely because the petitioner failed to appear or provide representation before the court. The accused, who was in judicial custody since January 30, 2026 for alleged cyber fraud offenses under IT Act Section 66D and BNS Sections 316 and 318(4), remains in custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 576/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Salem dismissed M. Balamurugan's bail petition (filed under Section 483 BNSS) without considering the merits, solely because the petitioner failed to appear or provide representation before the court. The accused, who was in judicial custody since January 30, 2026 for alleged cyber fraud offenses under IT Act Section 66D and BNS Sections 316 and 318(4), remains in custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case