Inspector of Police, Malliyakarai P.S vs Selvakumar Advocate - RAVI R — 43/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 447,324,294(b),323,427,506(ii). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNSA010007792023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
575/2023
Filing Date
13-02-2023
Registration No
43/2023
Registration Date
13-02-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Salem
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
91
Police Station
Malliakarai P.S
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, Malliyakarai P.S
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Selvakumar Advocate - RAVI R
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Questioning
Questioning
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 04-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 27-02-2026 | Questioning |
Interim Orders
Summary This document is a witness deposition (PW10), not a court judgment with a final decision. PW10, a police officer, testifies about investigating a criminal case (Sessions Case No. 43/2023) involving charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, 447, 427, 506(ii) and the Woman Harassment Act against the accused Ashokan. The witness describes the arrest procedure, evidence collection, and investigation steps taken. The accused's cross-examination denies the allegations, claiming no evidence was seized and no connection to the case exists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This document is a witness deposition (PW10), not a court judgment with a final decision. PW10, a police officer, testifies about investigating a criminal case (Sessions Case No. 43/2023) involving charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, 447, 427, 506(ii) and the Woman Harassment Act against the accused Ashokan. The witness describes the arrest procedure, evidence collection, and investigation steps taken. The accused's cross-examination denies the allegations, claiming no evidence was seized and no connection to the case exists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts