S.Leela vs Suseela — 4/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 104. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

CMA - Civil Miscellaneous Appeal

CNR: TNSA010006242025

Filing Number

216/2025

Filing Date

04-Feb-2025

Registration No

4/2025

Registration Date

14-Mar-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Salem

Judge

8-III Additional District Judge

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 104

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.Leela

    Adv. SHANMUGAM.P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Suseela

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    III Additional District Judge

  3. 06-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    III Additional District Judge

  4. 02-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    III Additional District Judge

  5. 05-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    III Additional District Judge

  6. 07-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    III Additional District Judge

  7. 19-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    III Additional District Judge

  8. 18-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    III Additional District Judge

  9. 20-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    III Additional District Judge

  10. 02-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    III Additional District Judge

  11. 15-Apr-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The petition filed by S. Leela, Selvam, and Kasi seeking interim stay of execution proceedings (REP.No.79/2013) was dismissed. The petitioners claimed to be legal heirs entitled to a 2/7 share in the disputed property and argued that the 1st respondent, as a third-party purchaser of an undivided share, was not entitled to execution. However, the court found insufficient grounds for stay, noting that the petitioners had failed to produce adequate documentary evidence of their heirship status in earlier proceedings and that prolonged delay (10 years) had already occurred in execution of the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 15-Apr-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  13. 07-Apr-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  14. 04-Apr-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    III Additional District Judge

  15. 01-Apr-2025

    For further Proceedings

    III Additional District Judge

  16. 25-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 04-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by S. Leela, Selvam, and Kasi seeking interim stay of execution proceedings (REP.No.79/2013) was dismissed. The petitioners claimed to be legal heirs entitled to a 2/7 share in the disputed property and argued that the 1st respondent, as a third-party purchaser of an undivided share, was not entitled to execution. However, the court found insufficient grounds for stay, noting that the petitioners had failed to produce adequate documentary evidence of their heirship status in earlier proceedings and that prolonged delay (10 years) had already occurred in execution of the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case