P. SARASWATHI @ SANKARI vs P. SIVAKUMAR Advocate - RAMESH D, TAMIZHESELVAN S — 10/2024
Case under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents & Senior Citizens Act 2007 Section 125(1)(a)(d). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.
MC - Maintenance Case
CNR: TNRP090024312024
Next Hearing
22nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2429/2024
Filing Date
08-08-2024
Registration No
10/2024
Registration Date
08-08-2024
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Arakkonam
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P. SARASWATHI @ SANKARI
Adv. MR.K. KUTTY BALU
S. YUVASRI
Respondent(s)
P. SIVAKUMAR Advocate - RAMESH D, TAMIZHESELVAN S
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
CMP Pending
CMP Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 25-02-2026 | CMP Pending | |
| 19-01-2026 | CMP Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary This is a deposition of witness (not a judgment/order) recorded in Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Arakkonam, on June 6, 2025, in case M.C.10/2024. A 30-year-old woman (Saraswathi) testified under cross-examination regarding a matrimonial dispute with her husband. The witness testified about living separately after 9 months of marriage, disputes over jewelry and dowry, conflicting dates in her petition versus deposition, and allegations regarding the respondent's drinking habits and refusal of reconciliation. No judicial order was passed; this is merely a record of witness examination continuing the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary This is a deposition of witness (not a judgment/order) recorded in Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Arakkonam, on June 6, 2025, in case M.C.10/2024. A 30-year-old woman (Saraswathi) testified under cross-examination regarding a matrimonial dispute with her husband. The witness testified about living separately after 9 months of marriage, disputes over jewelry and dowry, conflicting dates in her petition versus deposition, and allegations regarding the respondent's drinking habits and refusal of reconciliation. No judicial order was passed; this is merely a record of witness examination continuing the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts