PADMAVATHY vs SUDHARSANAM Advocate - B.SURESH — 10/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
MC - Maintenance Case
CNR: TNRP090008512022
Filing Number
847/2022
Filing Date
06-Sep-2022
Registration No
10/2022
Registration Date
06-Sep-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Arakkonam
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PADMAVATHY
Adv. VENKATESAN V
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUDHARSANAM Advocate - B.SURESH
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
26-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
22-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
30-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
31-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
09-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
30-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
25-Jun-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
Case Summary Case No.: M.C.10/2022, Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Arakkonam Outcome: Witness deposition recorded on 25.06.2025. Witness Padmavathi (49-year-old housewife) testified in a matrimonial dispute case. She deposed that she filed for maintenance (alimony) for her daughter, confirming 28 years of marriage, property transfers by her husband, and their 4-year separation. The witness stated she opposes her daughter's cohabitation with the respondent without divorce settlement and seeks maintenance for her daughter. No cross-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
21-Jun-2025
Cmp Pending
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
18-Jun-2025
Cmp Pending
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
12-Jun-2025
Cmp Pending
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
05-Jun-2025
Cmp Pending
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
29-May-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
29-May-2025
Cmp Pending
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
27-May-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
27-May-2025
Cmp Pending
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
21-May-2025
Cmp Pending
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
19-May-2025
Cmp Pending
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
15-May-2025
Cmp Pending
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
30-Apr-2025
Cmp Pending
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
04-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
07-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
20-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
12-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
27-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
30-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
16-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
06-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
25-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
18-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
08-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
18-Oct-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
04-Oct-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
20-Sep-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
06-Sep-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
21-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
03-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
19-Jul-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
06-Jul-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
18-Jun-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
08-May-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
08-Apr-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
03-Apr-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
13-Mar-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
31-Jan-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
20-Dec-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
08-Nov-2023
Counter
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
20-Sep-2023
Counter
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
13-Sep-2023
Counter
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
02-Aug-2023
Counter
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
05-Jul-2023
Counter
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
31-May-2023
Counter
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
26-Apr-2023
Counter
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
05-Apr-2023
Counter
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
22-Feb-2023
Counter
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
25-Jan-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
14-Dec-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
10-Nov-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
07-Oct-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
-
06-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Sep-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 10/2022
Case Summary Case No.: M.C.10/2022, Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Arakkonam Outcome: Witness deposition recorded on 25.06.2025. Witness Padmavathi (49-year-old housewife) testified in a matrimonial dispute case. She deposed that she filed for maintenance (alimony) for her daughter, confirming 28 years of marriage, property transfers by her husband, and their 4-year separation. The witness stated she opposes her daughter's cohabitation with the respondent without divorce settlement and seeks maintenance for her daughter. No cross-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts