PADMAVATHY vs SUDHARSANAM Advocate - B.SURESH — 10/2022

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

MC - Maintenance Case

CNR: TNRP090008512022

Evidence

Next Hearing

24th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

847/2022

Filing Date

06-09-2022

Registration No

10/2022

Registration Date

06-09-2022

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Arakkonam

Judge

5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 125
MP/1/2025 Classification : 256 Cr.PC Section PADMAVATHYSUDHARSANAM
MP/2/2025 Classification : 126 Cr.PC Section SUDHARSANAMPADMAVATHY
MP/3/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section SUDHARSANAMPADMAVATHY
MP/4/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section SUDHARSANAMPADMAVATHY

Petitioner(s)

PADMAVATHY

Adv. VENKATESAN V

Respondent(s)

SUDHARSANAM Advocate - B.SURESH

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

23-03-2026

Evidence

09-03-2026

Evidence

23-02-2026

Evidence

11-02-2026

Evidence

23-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

25-06-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Case Summary Case No.: M.C.10/2022, Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Arakkonam Outcome: Witness deposition recorded on 25.06.2025. Witness Padmavathi (49-year-old housewife) testified in a matrimonial dispute case. She deposed that she filed for maintenance (alimony) for her daughter, confirming 28 years of marriage, property transfers by her husband, and their 4-year separation. The witness stated she opposes her daughter's cohabitation with the respondent without divorce settlement and seeks maintenance for her daughter. No cross-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: M.C.10/2022, Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Arakkonam Outcome: Witness deposition recorded on 25.06.2025. Witness Padmavathi (49-year-old housewife) testified in a matrimonial dispute case. She deposed that she filed for maintenance (alimony) for her daughter, confirming 28 years of marriage, property transfers by her husband, and their 4-year separation. The witness stated she opposes her daughter's cohabitation with the respondent without divorce settlement and seeks maintenance for her daughter. No cross-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Arakkonam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case