GANAVELU vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARAKKONAM TOWN POLICE STATION — 658/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 447,448,and506(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNRP090008072022
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
806/2022
Filing Date
22-08-2022
Registration No
658/2022
Registration Date
22-08-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Arakkonam
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GANAVELU
Adv. GOPINATH A
Respondent(s)
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARAKKONAM TOWN POLICE STATION
THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
G. KALPANA
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 26-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 05-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document records the deposition of a witness (Gnanavelu, age 53) in case STC.658/2022 before the Arakkonam Judicial Magistrate Court on April 8, 2025. The witness testified regarding disputes over Aadhar and family cards allegedly obtained fraudulently by the opposing party and his sons, claiming they were issued for addresses where they did not actually reside. The witness stated he filed a complaint with authorities in December 2024 after discovering the fraudulent documents and confirmed he had filed a case (case number not specified in excerpt) but testified he is not seeking any relief in this particular case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the deposition of a witness (Gnanavelu, age 53) in case STC.658/2022 before the Arakkonam Judicial Magistrate Court on April 8, 2025. The witness testified regarding disputes over Aadhar and family cards allegedly obtained fraudulently by the opposing party and his sons, claiming they were issued for addresses where they did not actually reside. The witness stated he filed a complaint with authorities in December 2024 after discovering the fraudulent documents and confirmed he had filed a case (case number not specified in excerpt) but testified he is not seeking any relief in this particular case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts