ARAKKONAM TALUK POLICE STATION vs KUMAR D Advocate - B.SARALADEVI — 75/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,294(b),323,506(1). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNRP090005542021

Filing Number

554/2021

Filing Date

09-Mar-2021

Registration No

75/2021

Registration Date

09-Mar-2021

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Arakkonam

Judge

5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

30

Police Station

AWPS, GUIDYATHAM

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,294(b),323,506(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARAKKONAM TALUK POLICE STATION

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KUMAR D Advocate - B.SARALADEVI

  2. 2.REJESWARI

  3. 3.SUSILA

  4. 4.KOLLAPURI

  5. 5.RAMESH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court (Case No. 75/2021) in Arakkonam acquitted all five accused individuals of charges under IPC Sections 147, 294(b), 323, and 506(i) relating to a January 5, 2017 assault incident. The court found that the prosecution failed to sufficiently prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the government witnesses gave contradictory testimonies that conflicted with the case narrative and undermined the prosecution's case. Consequently, the accused were discharged under CrPC Section 248(1), and their bail bonds were cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  10. 23-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  11. 06-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  12. 02-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  13. 30-Jan-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  14. 29-Dec-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  15. 18-Nov-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  16. 13-Oct-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  17. 22-Sep-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  18. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  19. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  20. 23-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  21. 16-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  22. 14-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  23. 07-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  24. 05-Mar-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  25. 24-Feb-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  26. 19-Feb-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  27. 03-Feb-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  28. 16-Dec-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  29. 18-Nov-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  30. 30-Sep-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  31. 13-Aug-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  32. 26-Jun-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  33. 22-May-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  34. 04-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  35. 27-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  36. 21-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  37. 12-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  38. 24-Aug-2023

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  39. 20-Jul-2023

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  40. 25-May-2023

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  41. 28-Feb-2023

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  42. 20-Feb-2023

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  43. 13-Feb-2023

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  44. 03-Jan-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  45. 29-Nov-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  46. 31-Oct-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  47. 22-Aug-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  48. 31-May-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  49. 28-Mar-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  50. 24-Jan-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  51. 13-Dec-2021

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  52. 12-Nov-2021

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  53. 13-Aug-2021

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  54. 17-May-2021

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

  55. 09-Mar-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 09-Mar-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 75/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court (Case No. 75/2021) in Arakkonam acquitted all five accused individuals of charges under IPC Sections 147, 294(b), 323, and 506(i) relating to a January 5, 2017 assault incident. The court found that the prosecution failed to sufficiently prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the government witnesses gave contradictory testimonies that conflicted with the case narrative and undermined the prosecution's case. Consequently, the accused were discharged under CrPC Section 248(1), and their bail bonds were cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case