MOHAMED HAMEED vs SI OF POLICE TOWN PS Advocate - YOGALAKSHMI — 146/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRP090002642026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

264/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

146/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Arakkonam

Judge

5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

MOHAMED HAMEED

Adv. DHAYANITHI S

Respondent(s)

SI OF POLICE TOWN PS (Police Station) Advocate - YOGALAKSHMI

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Arakkonam

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Issue of Service

06-03-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

The Judicial Magistrate Court, Arakkonam granted bail to Mohamed Hameed, accused under sections of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, considering he had been in custody since March 5, 2026, the victim was discharged, and his willingness to comply with court conditions. The bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, police reporting for 10 days, non-tampering with evidence/witnesses, and restrictions on leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court, Arakkonam granted bail to Mohamed Hameed, accused under sections of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, considering he had been in custody since March 5, 2026, the victim was discharged, and his willingness to comply with court conditions. The bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, police reporting for 10 days, non-tampering with evidence/witnesses, and restrictions on leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court No. I, Arakkonam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case